• @jedrax
    link
    18
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • @TheAnonymouseJokerM
      link
      02 years ago

      Not wrong, but there needs to be a defining line where one is knowledgeable and an authority on the subject, and one who is not. Gatekeeping can be a really trashy attitude, which is a reason I focus so much on smartphone guide because it covers the one massive problem in the life of almost every tech user. Also, threat modelling is something I strive to make easy, and I openly welcome people who want to take advice from me. I help people and I like to help people.

      • @jedrax
        link
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        deleted by creator

        • @TheAnonymouseJokerM
          link
          -12 years ago

          I never refer to them as normies. I have a better name that does not offend anyone – privacy seekers. Sometimes I may phrase them as ordinary people that are less tech savvy.

          • @jedrax
            link
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            deleted by creator

  • @vin047
    link
    42 years ago

    We need a Carl Sagan/Neil Degrasse Tyson/David Attenborough figure too.

  • bunkrra
    link
    32 years ago

    thanks for bringing this up.

    we need to create whole new methodogy and “product time-line” for this.

    link is very helpful. cheers!

  • weex
    link
    3
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I think most people understand that some things need to be secret aka private, like their passwords. I wonder if there are any old folktales about gossip in towns and villages that would be fun to rewrite for now. I named the open source community !magicstone based on one of those old stories and I think it helps get the idea across of building something great through community.