Context: I’m a second year medical student and currently residing in the deepest pit in the valley of the Dunning-Kruger graph, but am still constantly frustrated and infuriated with the push for introducing AI for quasi-self-diagnosis and loosening restrictions on inadequately educated providers like NP’s from the for-profit “schools”.

So, anyone else in a similar spot where you think you’re kinda dumb, but you know you’re still smarter than robots and people at the peak of the Dunning-Kruger graph in your field?

  • montar
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    It wouldn’t need to be AI, just sone statistics and “Crdiac arrest? Piority 9. Broken arm? piority 1” decision-making.

    I’m a tech wizard not a healer, there probably are factors that define one cardiac arrest even more critical than the other i just do not know them.

    • medgremlin@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      There’s some things you look for that are difficult to describe to someone who hasn’t seen it before. That’s part of why experience is so valuable in Emergency Medicine, and it’s not uncommon to put your best nurses out in triage. People will do this kinda twitchy/wilting/loss of focus/change in pallor/change in posture right before they go down. I don’t have a good way to describe it, and it might be easier to draw even, because it really is a body language thing and the general appearance of the patient that can inform your decision making.