I’m politically agnostic and have moved from a slightly conservative stance to a vastly more progressive stance (european). i still dont get the more niche things like tankies and anarchists at this point but I would like to, without spending 10 hours reading endless manifests (which do have merit, no doubt, but still).

Can someone explain to me why anarchy isnt the guy (or gal, or gang, or entity) with the bigger stick making the rules?

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That sounds like anarchy is the societal equivalent of a radioactive element. It is what it is, until some random amount of time when some shit kicks off and it becomes something else.

    • madelena
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, and those who has grown a community or company will understand this. The emergence of power structures isn’t a matter of if, but when.