• umbrella
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    im presenting you with a simple, common but strong argument for it.

    you can choose to engage with it with nuance or, apparently, attack me.

    you won’t agree with every set of ideals out there, that doesn’t mean it isnt tought out.

    • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Your argument is not relevant to anything I said. So I don’t want to engage with it because it derails the discussion here, which is not about the ethics of piracy but about the community’s openness to discussing it.

      • umbrella
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        yes it is. you just dont want to have that discussion.

        the community will rightfully shun people parroting the copyrights holders arguments and bad faith arguing, because thats not the place to be if you hate piracy.

        • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          They can do whatever they want, it’s their community. Just don’t tell me there’s a nuanced discussion going on there.

          • umbrella
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            well dont tell me there isnt while refusing to engage.

            • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              I did engage multiple times in that community, when it was on topic. I eventually learned that there was no point in doing so.