It seems like your problem is that he is vocal about his views. In reality he isn’t much different in his effect then Zuckerberg, or Larry Page, or Murdoc, Huffman or anyone else that controls large platforms and enforces policies that shape the “acceptable” discourse on the platform. To put it bluntly, in a capitalist society you are forced to engage with Capitalists. Trying to be “ethical” in your consumption is waste of your time.
You got my number on that one. And you’re right about them being cut from the same cloth and part of a bigger problem. I suppose Musk annoys me more because he’s louder.
I can’t argue against being ethical in media consumption being a waste of time in the sense that the tiny percentage of us that choose to boycott any given platform make no difference. But I think having ideals and following them is worthwhile and I will continue to do so.
But I was also sincere in my statement that I don’t think you (or anyone) has to share that concern. Those are my ideals. They don’t have to be yours and I don’t expect that of anyone.
While I know this thread isn’t really for me, since I don’t have a twitter and never have, admittedly I am still exposed to and click on tweets way more often then I’d like. But ultimately, as odious as I find Musk (pun intended), there isn’t really anything he can do that would stop me from laughing at a tweet or whatever. So while you are right that I don’t “have” to, the reality is that with the network effect dictating where I or my friends find those funny tweets, I don’t really have a choice. And besides, every time someone shares a tweet it is literally costing Elon money.
I don’t understand, why should I care about what interchangeable capitalist owns the social media I use?
This particular capitalist is having a significant impact on that platform.
If that doesn’t concern you (and it doesn’t have to) then carry on with giving no shits.
It seems like your problem is that he is vocal about his views. In reality he isn’t much different in his effect then Zuckerberg, or Larry Page, or Murdoc, Huffman or anyone else that controls large platforms and enforces policies that shape the “acceptable” discourse on the platform. To put it bluntly, in a capitalist society you are forced to engage with Capitalists. Trying to be “ethical” in your consumption is waste of your time.
You got my number on that one. And you’re right about them being cut from the same cloth and part of a bigger problem. I suppose Musk annoys me more because he’s louder.
I can’t argue against being ethical in media consumption being a waste of time in the sense that the tiny percentage of us that choose to boycott any given platform make no difference. But I think having ideals and following them is worthwhile and I will continue to do so.
But I was also sincere in my statement that I don’t think you (or anyone) has to share that concern. Those are my ideals. They don’t have to be yours and I don’t expect that of anyone.
While I know this thread isn’t really for me, since I don’t have a twitter and never have, admittedly I am still exposed to and click on tweets way more often then I’d like. But ultimately, as odious as I find Musk (pun intended), there isn’t really anything he can do that would stop me from laughing at a tweet or whatever. So while you are right that I don’t “have” to, the reality is that with the network effect dictating where I or my friends find those funny tweets, I don’t really have a choice. And besides, every time someone shares a tweet it is literally costing Elon money.