It’s a good explanation on what is really going on with that. It’s not a good regulation, but it isn’t some Orwellian thing like I’ve been seeing people say either.

  • @poVoq
    link
    6
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • @Thann
      link
      33 years ago

      This is what makes it Orwellian IMO; They’re hunting with nukes. They really need to target micro-transactions and loot-boxes, not everyone under 18.

      • @ttmrichter
        link
        53 years ago

        Yes. They should expend enormous time and effort identifying each possible iteration and evasion that these companies are going to try.

        Or they can cut off the revenue streams at the knee and force the companies to either adapt into something less openly harmful or die.

        • @poVoq
          link
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • @ttmrichter
            link
            23 years ago

            What!?

            We’re talking about the online games here. It’s not mostly adults spending money on them. It’s children and adults both.

            • @poVoq
              link
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              deleted by creator

              • @ttmrichter
                link
                13 years ago

                Has more? Adults. Spends more on games? Children. By far. Often by either harassing their parents until they give in (both parents tend to work long hours) or by outright stealing it.

        • @Thann
          link
          13 years ago

          This doesn’t really make sense. It’s destroying an industry to prevent bad actors. Basically the same as banning driving to prevent drunk driving. It’s really not impossible to have a competent rating system for games, especially for a country that spends so much on sanitizing the internet of whinny the poo =\