I haven’t used Diaspora yet. I have heard people say that its not really good and Friendica is better, which I also have never tried. Whats your experience with these platforms?

    • Tmpod
      4•3 years ago

      I believe this idea is wrong. The definition of the a fediverse (according to Wikipedia) is

      "an ensemble of federated (i.e. interconnected) servers that are used for web publishing (i.e. social networking, microblogging, blogging, or websites) and file hosting, but which, while independently hosted, can communicate with each other. " 1

      Yes, a fediverse.
      Matrix chats can’t understand Mastodon, Mastodon can’t understand Matrix chats, therefore they cannot exist in the same fediverse. Matrix chats can understand Cactus comments and vice versa, they speak the same language (the Matrix protocol), so they coexist in the Matrix fediverse. Same thing can be said about the Diaspora protocol.

      It just so happens that ActivityPub is a W3C backed protocol and the most popular for social media, so people refer to its fediverse as “The” fediverse.
      I agree there ought to be a name change (call it ActivityPub Fediverse or something along those lines), but I can’t agree that Matrix and Diaspora are part of it.

      Edit: Add Wikipedia page reference.

      • @poVoq
        3•1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • Tmpod
          2•3 years ago

          I see your point yeah. I guess we should call Fediverse to the collective of all federated software, which is then subdevided into protocol-based networks, where services can interoperate.

        • @TheConquestOfBed
          1•3 years ago

          It seems like most activitypub apps have a goal of connecting with masto for visibility, but a lot don’t get that far because of development time.