• Communist
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, they have a tiny, insignificant amount.

    An entire country has to have workplace democracy for the country to be socialist.

    This is kinda like saying “doesn’t any country with a slice of bread have food”

    • trailing9
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      What would change if every company would be democratic?

      • Moonguide
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        To begin with, there wouldn’t be an unspoken agreement between companies to keep wages as low as they can be because more than half of the companies in that market agree that the best they can do is starvation wages.

    • daddyjones@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You think a co-op only has a tiny amount of democracy? I think it’s the best form of workers owning the means of production - the definition of socialism.

      • joejoefashosho@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        I believe they meant that worker cooperatives are a small, almost insignificant part of the overall economy in every country that has them. Often co-ops end up serving a small niche market because they really can’t compete with the anti-competitive nature of capitalist big business.

      • Communist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not what I said, my point is that co-ops make up a tiny fraction of a percentage of the economy. If they made up all of it, that would be socialism.