There seems to be a current of “pro sex work” in the left yet prostitution (to me at least) is not work it is not labour. Nothing of value is produced and all that’s provided is access of womens bodies to be raped by bourgeois men

Also does anyone have writings on the new trend of polyamoury?

Surely this has underpinnings in economy rather than “free choice to coshare a house amongst 4 people” (as in split rent 4 ways due to rent hikes)?

Again the trend of polyamoury seems to have it’s underpinnings in economy and the stunted sexual development of adults that are no longer able to “grow up” because wages are flat, houses are out of reach and rent is sky high. So why not YOLO and engage in as much meaningless sex as possible and collect relationships like commodities

(I’ve provided my opinions here but am looking for a solid marxist analysis of prostitution and polyamoury)

    • XiangMai@lemmygrad.mlOP
      5·
      4 years ago

      OK I will preface I didn’t come here to argue but to expand my knowledge on this.

      Is sex work labour though? How come normal people are not paid for sex if sex is labour?

      This operates under the assumption that whatever can be sold should be sold. This is a bourgeois value system.

      The prostitution industry is an industry of mass rape. Not only that most of them are trafficked so are literal slaves or under violent control of pimps.

      If we expand this to the Only Fans phenomena we see Monopoly taking control there with the most beautiful women/men earning hundreds of thousands whilst bourgeois men from the West use the difference in purchasing power of their currency (backed by USA military) to throw the equivalent of pennies at desperate women in Phillipines or India to drink their own piss/shit on camera for perverts in the West

      Or if we look at the porn industry we see the porn stars who slept with James Dean coming out to say he raped them when during a scene he just shoved it in their ass to get a “anal scene”

      Take this documentary for instance about BBC visiting young models in Ukraine and Russia

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GE-ZDS86F9k&t=1279s

      Part way through the documentary when the 14-15 year olds are parading themselves in front of the managers for a shot at being picked the BBC presenter turns to the camera and says “back in Soviet times they would’ve gone to school, got a degree and be assigned a job. Now they can model and earn 30 x that salary in a year.” This is liberalism - not seeing the inherent value in educating your population to the highest to their ability and only seeing the $$$ signs that can be earned.

      And I’ve never stated I favour criminalising prostitution only that I don’t view it as “work” and prostitution reproduces bourgeois morality and the conditions we wish to overthrow