• @poVoq
    link
    3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • @southerntofu
      link
      43 years ago

      What does “tankie” even mean these days?

      I don’t know the historical reference. For me tankie is just US slang for marxist-leninists. But i agree i strongly dislike this label because it’s not easy to understand (internal reference) and does not point out actual problems. I have no problem calling out some marxist-leninists for being would-be tyrants and genocide deniers. However, not all marxists are the same and not all folks waiving a sickle and a hammer are dangerous psychopaths.

      I would say let actions speak for themselves

      Agreed. That’s a very anarchist principle, not dividing people along party lines but along practices. This is also a useful approach for restorative justice and community accountability, to recognize that one’s intentions and one’s result of an action are not the same. No matter what the intentions are, actions can be good or bad.

      PRC fan-boyism

      That’s very worrying. There was a lot of that with Russia and Turkey a few years back at the height of the Syria wars. Authoritarians of all stripes sure love them some tyranny ;) It’s like i’m not happy with my master so i’ll advertise another one instead… what could possibly go wrong? :P

      • @poVoq
        link
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • @southerntofu
          link
          33 years ago

          defended the brutal crackdowns (with troops and tanks) of the Soviet Union on popular uprisings in eastern Europe

          Aaaaaah that makes entire sense! Thanks for the explanation!

          I think it is mostly harmless

          I don’t think cheering on any kind of blood-hungry empire (whether China, USA, France, India or Brasil or any other) is harmless. These people are literally preparing the next world war, or are you not noticing the huge increase in border control and military propaganda in the past years?

          • @poVoq
            link
            5
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            deleted by creator

            • @southerntofu
              link
              -13 years ago

              it is the west that will likely start a world war

              I agree it’s more likely but you never know for sure. We are just speculating :)

              poverty elevation or technological progress

              This is partially true. But social progress in China is driven not by the party but by huge popular movements, strikes and protests. The party stands by its repression until a certain movement grows too large/popular and then they revoke local officials and claim they were responsible for going against the party member’s desire for progress in sketchy trials.

              It’s important to note also that ecological concern is growing in China. China has become a giant factory/dumpster for the entire planet and this has dire ecological consequences. Pollution and ecological damage is one of the many factors that encouraged western corporations to outsource production over there. The ecological movements in China are facing repression and the corruption of the State with big industry players ; the same can be said about the land/housing preservation movement against gentrification.

              All this is my very limited (french-based) understanding of chinese politics but it doesn’t seem much better than over here in terms of popular autonomy and aspirations for social justice.

              • @Nevar
                link
                3
                edit-2
                3 years ago

                deleted by creator

                • @southerntofu
                  link
                  33 years ago

                  the world’s biggest investor in clean energy research

                  <sarcasm>Yes, please tell me more about how green capitalism is going to save the world.</sarcasm>

                  You may find it interesting to read or watch something on the topic. I would strongly recommend End:Civ, and to a lesser degree Planet of the Humans which is way less interesting from a political perspective, but has great explanation of why “green” capitalism isn’t green and “renewable” energies aren’t renewable.

                  TLDR: “clean energy” and technological innovation won’t save us (source: tech person myself, please don’t trust us to make serious decisions for the future of humanity). only less consumption a serious deconstruction of the car/concrete society, high ecological standards (think no paints, no plastics, no concrete in daily life) and a serious fight against planned obsolescence (and intellectual property of any kind that makes it possible in the first place) might have a chance to save humanity, not exactly as we know it (over-abundance and misery) but as a society of reasonable-abundance and justice.

                  China didn’t withdraw from the Paris Agreement, the USA did.

                  Sure. I’m not here to vilify China and defend western empires. I’m an anarchist, i strongly oppose any State though i don’t take a neutral stance when it comes to military interventions. My heart stands with the Kurds and the Palestinians and all the oppressed peoples on this planet. Fire to all colonial empires, even France (my birthplace) and China!

                  • @Nevar
                    link
                    2
                    edit-2
                    3 years ago

                    deleted by creator