I don’t get it. In this book, he specifically mentions how Afghans said the Soviets treated them much better than Americans. He actually says positive things about the USSR in this book.
He has suggested that he was the minor author of this book. He gets all the credit because of that documentary and because he’s so well known (possibly because the bourgeoisie would rather people read Chomsky than any Marxist). But Herman may have written this section, and the better part of the book. It’s hard to know, but given Chomsky’s record…
He’s got more than that. He was pretty good on Ukraine and I read his book ‘manufacturing consent’ it was mostly based (pointing out hypocrisy in coverage of Latin American elections, fake stuff blamed on the soviets, a relatively decent take on Polpot as far as I could tell, and he clearly hated the the Soviet invasion of Afganistán, but you’d be hard pressed to find someone who really supports it)
I was left kinda confused. I think his point was that the American bombing of Cambodia was worse and led to polpot coming to power, but more complicated. Maybe?
Turns out Chomsky was secretly a Stalinist this whole time
Top 10 anime plot twists you never saw coming
Side note: it’s really surprising finding out he has even 1 based take.
I don’t get it. In this book, he specifically mentions how Afghans said the Soviets treated them much better than Americans. He actually says positive things about the USSR in this book.
Some people are just weirdos.
Well that’s a difference from 100 trillion killed Stalin secret police totalitarianism Chernobyl etc
He has suggested that he was the minor author of this book. He gets all the credit because of that documentary and because he’s so well known (possibly because the bourgeoisie would rather people read Chomsky than any Marxist). But Herman may have written this section, and the better part of the book. It’s hard to know, but given Chomsky’s record…
He’s got more than that. He was pretty good on Ukraine and I read his book ‘manufacturing consent’ it was mostly based (pointing out hypocrisy in coverage of Latin American elections, fake stuff blamed on the soviets, a relatively decent take on Polpot as far as I could tell, and he clearly hated the the Soviet invasion of Afganistán, but you’d be hard pressed to find someone who really supports it)
Yeah, but his take on Pol Pot is weird
Everything related to Pol Pot is weird.
I was left kinda confused. I think his point was that the American bombing of Cambodia was worse and led to polpot coming to power, but more complicated. Maybe?