He’s got more than that. He was pretty good on Ukraine and I read his book ‘manufacturing consent’ it was mostly based (pointing out hypocrisy in coverage of Latin American elections, fake stuff blamed on the soviets, a relatively decent take on Polpot as far as I could tell, and he clearly hated the the Soviet invasion of Afganistán, but you’d be hard pressed to find someone who really supports it)
I was left kinda confused. I think his point was that the American bombing of Cambodia was worse and led to polpot coming to power, but more complicated. Maybe?
He’s got more than that. He was pretty good on Ukraine and I read his book ‘manufacturing consent’ it was mostly based (pointing out hypocrisy in coverage of Latin American elections, fake stuff blamed on the soviets, a relatively decent take on Polpot as far as I could tell, and he clearly hated the the Soviet invasion of Afganistán, but you’d be hard pressed to find someone who really supports it)
Yeah, but his take on Pol Pot is weird
Everything related to Pol Pot is weird.
I was left kinda confused. I think his point was that the American bombing of Cambodia was worse and led to polpot coming to power, but more complicated. Maybe?