• renor
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 years ago

      People really have to learn to differenciate between PRIVACY and ANONIMITY. Two different concepts.

      • cipherpunk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 years ago

        Anonymity IS privacy. Specifically, anonymity is privacy of identity. So no, it’s not two different concepts. It’s a subset/superset relationship of the same thing.

        Calling “privacy” and “anonymity” two different concepts is an attempt to downplay the importance of anonymity. The problem is that you never have absolute privacy, and when privacy is attacked or lost for one reason or another you better have anonymity. You should think of anonymity as a 2nd layer of protection from disclosure.

        • renor
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 years ago

          That’s a good point. Thanks for sharing this view

        • cipherpunk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 years ago

          You cannot use Signal without a mobile phone subscription. All mobile phone connections (CDMA or GSM alike) inherently impose tracking. Additionally, most of Europe imposes GSM registration which is linked to national ID. So the mere precondition to establish such service is in itself privacy abuse – and that’s before we even talk about forced disclosure of the phone number to OWS.

            • tanuki
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 years ago

              As have I, although using a Google Voice number, so avoiding one devil for a different one.