Most of the time when people say they have an unpopular opinion, it turns out it’s actually pretty popular.

Do you have some that’s really unpopular and most likely will get you downvoted?

  • masquenox
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Does the working class control the means of production where you live?

    Yes?

    No?

    If it’s not the former, it’s not socialism. In any way whatsoever. Period. That is it.

    • Elderos@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Part of it yes, it is a mixed economy. State-owned corporations whenever it makes sense, welfare state, income redistribution, regulation of the economy, all in all within capitalism. Again, Social Democracy is just a subset of socialism applied to capitalism. Full-blown ownership of the means of production by the workers, without a private sector, that’d be just plain socialism or communism.

      • masquenox
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Part of it yes, it is a mixed economy.

        So the answer is no.

        Which means… drumroll… no socialism involved whatsoever.

        State-owned corporations

        Soooo… no socialism?

        all in all within capitalism.

        Soooo… still no socialism?

        just plain socialism

        There is no such thing as “plain socialism” - there is socialism and then there is not-socialism.

        • Elderos@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          The whole point of social democracy is to borrow concepts and values from socialism, I never said it is socialism. I am not even sure what you’re arguing about and why you’re so obstinate on such a pedantic point.

          First off, good luck finding a definition of social democracy out there that can skim over the parallels with socialism. At this point I tried in good faith, but obviously you have a problem with the actual definition of social democracy, this is not something I made up, this described as such everywhere.

          You’re free to use whatever made-up definition of your own, as I am sure someone as obstinate and strongly opinionated as you are won’t be moving an inch, as it would seem there is no chance you will actually research what is social democracy. Sure it is a nationalism movement or whatever you say. This could have been an interesting conversation, but yeah I suppose you’re here to bludgeon your strong opinions on people and to be insufferable about it. Have a good day.

          • masquenox
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            The whole point of social democracy is to borrow concepts and values from socialism

            The nazis borrowed the word “socialist,” too - and it doesn’t make the nazis any more socialist than social democracy. And just like the nazis, social democracy borrows nothing from socialism except the word “social.”

            Socialism only has one value and one concept - the workers control the means of production. You can’t “borrow” this concept because it’s already free for anyone to take. If you don’t take it, it means you don’t have anything that can be called socialism with a straight face.