mayflower to Asklemmy · 1 year agoWhat is something you've done that was questionable but legal?message-squaremessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up173arrow-down12
arrow-up171arrow-down1message-squareWhat is something you've done that was questionable but legal?mayflower to Asklemmy · 1 year agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-squareraubarnolinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down1·1 year agoCopied an example source code, which was under MIT+Apache 2.0 license, and created a derivative work under GPL, maybe that’s questionable?
minus-squareiByteABit [he/him]@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·1 year agoAfter a quick research, this should be fine. It means that the original is theirs and licensed under MIT and Apache 2.0, and your modifications are yours and licensed under GPL
minus-squareplistig@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoAs long as you properly mentioned the source, that’s fine and in the spirit of all three licenses.
Copied an example source code, which was under MIT+Apache 2.0 license, and created a derivative work under GPL, maybe that’s questionable?
After a quick research, this should be fine. It means that the original is theirs and licensed under MIT and Apache 2.0, and your modifications are yours and licensed under GPL
As long as you properly mentioned the source, that’s fine and in the spirit of all three licenses.