• raubarno
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Copied an example source code, which was under MIT+Apache 2.0 license, and created a derivative work under GPL, maybe that’s questionable?

    • iByteABit [he/him]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      After a quick research, this should be fine. It means that the original is theirs and licensed under MIT and Apache 2.0, and your modifications are yours and licensed under GPL

    • plistig@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      As long as you properly mentioned the source, that’s fine and in the spirit of all three licenses.