You must be pretty new to arguments in general when you think people just believe you without a source if you just insult them enough. Incidentally, you also violate the rules of this Lemmy community:
Rules: Be civil, be respectful, don’t attack other users
“Not Chinese but here’s what I think about China anyway because I can’t listen instead of speak.”
There’s nothing to listen to if you don’t say something of substance.
Because there’s not enough hours in the day to link to trivially-searched information to counter every ignoramus that thinks their opinion matters anyway.
I’m not their Google/Duckduckgo/Bing/Baidu/whatever stenographer. Google et al are a few keystrokes away. They can do the legwork themselves.
“Not Chinese but here’s what I think about China anyway because I can’t listen instead of speak.”
What is wrong with their assessment? Why do you think ad hominems will make you right?
Copyright laws (and other IP laws) exist in China. Ergo “never existed in Chinese history” is false on the face of it. Q.E.D.
Duh.
Then why didn’t you say so and for example link an English translation but insult them?
You must be pretty new to arguments in general when you think people just believe you without a source if you just insult them enough. Incidentally, you also violate the rules of this Lemmy community:
There’s nothing to listen to if you don’t say something of substance.
Because there’s not enough hours in the day to link to trivially-searched information to counter every ignoramus that thinks their opinion matters anyway.
I’m not their Google/Duckduckgo/Bing/Baidu/whatever stenographer. Google et al are a few keystrokes away. They can do the legwork themselves.
It takes longer to type your useless rebuttals and insults than to counter with facts. You’re just not capable to do that apparently.