we are definitely being target especially after that time article oh well rent free kek

  • @Mouseasel@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    17
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    As wide spread use as Discord gets, leftists should begin to seek out better platforms to associate on. For awhile me and my gf used what I felt was a superior platform called “Signal”.

      • @Mouseasel@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        92 years ago

        My 6th sense was telling me someone would hit me with something like this. Thank you for making me aware, I see this has a section for better alternatives.

      • Amicese
        link
        8
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • Muad'Dibber
          link
          fedilink
          11
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It is a fact that Signal got its main initial funding from radio free asia, and that RFA even a few years ago was doing damage control on behalf of signal. How is that not evidence of US involvement?

          Also, as that article states, the issue is that even if the message content is secure, the metadata isn’t: signal can provide social graphs of actual people, dates, and times to the US.

          • unfinished | 🇵🇸
            link
            12 years ago

            Saying that Signal is some sort of CIA tool is fearmongering. It isn’t perfect but it is a good replacement for apps like Whatsapp and iMessage. Of course decentralized services like Matrix are superior, but it is much easier to get your friends and family to use Signal than something like Element. Both services have their use cases, and just dismissing Signal as a CIA tool wont get us anywhere.

            • Muad'Dibber
              link
              fedilink
              122 years ago

              You just keep repeating “trust signal”, with absolutely nothing to support that. Completely ignoring its direct links both to US regime-change orgs, and its inherently insecure US domiciled setup.

              The article I gave provides tons of reasons signal isn’t trustworthy, and why no one should use it. You seem to be doing the standard thing of “its easy to use and has a nice UI, so that means it can be trusted!”. Do you have any reasons why I should trust signal, and any proof that it hasn’t received a NSL letter, meaning everyone who uses it is being spied on?

              • unfinished | 🇵🇸
                link
                -2
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                I do agree with the metadata problem, but what is the problem with someone in the US using Signal to chat with friends? My main point here is to not just dismiss Signal entirely, but instead understand the problems with it, and in what situations you should be using it.

                • Muad'Dibber
                  link
                  fedilink
                  102 years ago

                  The people most at risk for using signal, are US citizens. There’s a very high chance that Signal, being a US domiciled company, means its database is compromised. That gives the US gov / NSA / police social graphs, who is using signal, who is talking to who, and when. If you’re in an activist group, an anti-capitalist party, an anti-landlord group, the US government knows who you are talking with, when, and all of your names and addresses.

                  • unfinished | 🇵🇸
                    link
                    42 years ago

                    I think that’s a reasonable concern. Do you suggest using Matrix for everything then? That would be a challenge, especially getting less tech savvy people to start using Element.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
              link
              fedilink
              112 years ago

              One of the main issues with Signal is that it’s a central server based on US. So, ultimately even if Signal isn’t doing anything nefarious themselves it’s still subject to US laws. So, if nothing else US can just order them to shut down the server.