Some of the LinkedIn Responses are direct and on-point, and also hilariously/depressingly based depending on how you look at it:

EDIT: In hindsight, I think I should’ve looked into posting this in a different community… It’s closer to a silly “innovation”… soo… is this considered FUD? I also don’t support smoking or vaping, especially among kids. Original title had “privacy-violating” before the “solution”.

  • verdigris
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    137
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 days ago

    Good God I hate linkedin types. Imagine thinking writing an app that literally just displays a single notification is worthy of making a whole post about. They basically wrote a Hello World app for Android TV. And I’m sure they got paid like 40k by some poor school district to do so.

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      14 days ago

      I physically cannot read LinkedIn for more than 5 minutes at a time. I get seriously nauseated 🤢🤢🤢 from all the corporate talk

      • toastal
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 days ago

        Deleting your Microsoft LinkedIn account is an option

          • toastal
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            Only luck I had that route was getting a free coffee & b1tcted about the industry. Networking is better than recruiters 95% of the time anyhow. Microsoft doesn’t deserve your data or attention.

            • expr@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              12 days ago

              I’m a senior software engineer with a pretty uncommon skill set. Recruiters are the primary way that companies hire in my industry outside of networking contacts and I get contacted frequently. The job before my current one was through a recruiter.

              I very much dislike Microsoft and LinkedIn in general, but not using it all is a huge handicap that isn’t worth taking on.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      13 days ago

      … Do you think reading a sensor and then accurately determining when the sensor data meets a threshold is the same as displaying static text? Kind of an exaggeration

      • MrRedstoner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        In all likelihood calling manufacturer’s API to read the value then compare to a compile-time constant? It’s a notification hello-world merged with display-a-list hello world and manufacturer’s reading-sensor-values hello world. Yes I do think it’s borderline trivial

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          13 days ago

          Congratulations you’re clearly an amazing developer if you have to talk about this so weirdly

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              13 days ago

              Yeah what I think is weird is that you make a bunch of assumptions about how the app is built. Experienced developers imo know that things are unexpectedly difficult all the time. Even when they are supposed to be as simple as you’re assuming here.

              • MrRedstoner@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                12
                ·
                13 days ago

                Absolutely I am making a bunch of assumptions. Following the tried and true Keep It Simple Stupid approach. Because there is no indication given that any more complexity is required, and keeping complexity to a minimum is key to efficient development. If there was anything actually technically impressive (or at least technically impressive sounding) about what they did, I trust they would have mentioned it.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  I’m pretty sure this guy was just a project manager or similar. So yeah I am not surprised they’re not mentioning technical hurdles.

              • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                Ok but this is very simple. Everyone can set up something like this using home assistant and a few sensors connected up to it

                  • MrRedstoner@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    13 days ago

                    set up != write software

                    From the little I played with Arduino’s IoT platform, I honestly believe that if there is a compatible sensor that can detect vape smoke, almost anyone could get a simple version up and running. It was a very simple and largely automated setup if all you want is to get the sensor output to the portal and then link it to a UI element.

                    Of course gluing together this software is more complex than that, but it’s no grand feat either.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        13 days ago

        Vape “detectors” are the latest off-the-shelf scam product sold to well-meaning but technically clueless school administrators. They don’t work at all but they have a solid sales pitch. This tv app isn’t doing anything but forwarding a notification provided by the manufacturer of the “detection “ device.

      • verdigris
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        That’s not what the post is about, it’s entirely about the android TV app. I assume they already built the functionally to generate the alarm signal (since it’s the entire raison d’etre for the company based on the name).

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          13 days ago

          Right a lot of assumptions are being made here. The only thing I assume is this company built some app

          • verdigris
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            I mean, I’m assuming that because that’s what he’s saying in the text.