if I have communications with someone through the internet with a homeserver. I would inevitably give out my IP address. Is that a bad thing? In my country they don’t have services like that, RTCing would be a bit sluggish using available euro servers.

  • @DPUGT2
    link
    12 years ago

    I’ve been wondering about this on-and-off for years.

    What if I didn’t give a shit? Like, maybe 1% of my gmail emails are complete garbage. Of those 1%, absolutely all of them are responses to account signups or online ordering off of big websites. For those, I could continue to use my gmail account.

    But, at this point, email’s almost worthless for real communication. If I wanted it to be for real communication, why could I not set up my own email server that is configured such that it blocks all non-encrypted emails received? Just bounces them outright. This means that it instantly becomes a zero-spammable service for me. And the dozen or so friends/family I might want to receive emails from can just get accounts on it.

    I understand (and want) it to be isolated from the greater email system. Is this possible?

    And if others wanted to (for shits and giggles? dunno) become part of it, it’d be as simple for them to set up similarly configured email servers. You could even test them automatically that they were following the rules… send an unencrypted email to it, and if it doesn’t bounce just blacklist them.

    I guess there’d have to be some sort of public key infrastructure for it, no idea how to do that.

    • @poVoq
      link
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • @DPUGT2
        link
        22 years ago

        My work email has been automated notices about things that aren’t usually my responsibility, mixed in with online-meeting invitations and HR pseudo-spam for at least 3 years.

        Strangely, my phone became the same over about the same time period. I don’t know that I’ve had a legitimate phone call in as many years… if anything’s even close, it’s some person with a wrong number (fewer and fewer of those though, too).

        There’s some grander sociology mechanism at work here, but I haven’t quite managed to figure it out myself. Are all communications networks bound to the same fate eventually?