The most common argument used in defense of mass surveillance is ‘If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear’. Try saying that to women in the US states where abortion has suddenly become illegal. Say it to investigative journalists in authoritarian countries. Saying ‘I have nothing to hide’ means you stop caring about anyone fighting for their freedom. And one day, you might be one of them.

The most common argument used in defense of mass surveillance is ‘If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear’. Try saying that to women in the US states where abortion has suddenly become illegal. Say it to investigative journalists in authoritarian countries. Saying ‘I have nothing to hide’ means you stop caring about anyone fighting for their freedom. And one day, you might be one of them.

  • GolfNovemberUniform
    1196·
    5 months ago

    Abortion should be illegal because it violates the UDHR. The UDHR was edited in 2018 to include the right of abortion. Other than that true.

    EDIT: sorry for turning this into an off topic political discussion. Didn’t mean to do it here. Delete this comment if you want.

          • GolfNovemberUniform
            514·
            5 months ago

            Nobody can ever know even remotely everything. It’s physically impossible. I’m not a lawyer so it’s not even my main sphere of interest.

            • gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world
              131·
              5 months ago

              You’re right, nobody can ever know even remotely everything.

              Luckily, the same device you used to post that comment can also be used to check if what you are about to say is actually true, so you can prevent yourself from spreading misinformation like this in the future.

        • ZeroHoraEnglish
          17·
          5 months ago

          Further proof that what is illegal or not is volatile.

      • GolfNovemberUniform
        242·
        5 months ago

        Calling someone’s opinion “incorrect” shows the true nature of you and the people you represent.

        • subignition@fedia.io
          291·
          5 months ago

          Abortion should be illegal because it violates the UDHR.

          This is an (unsubstantiated) allegation of fact, not an opinion.

          • GolfNovemberUniform
            120·
            5 months ago

            I agree because someone told me that the law was edited but the person who replied clearly said “opinion”, not “information”. I do believe that was a sign of toxicity and not just laziness or English issue. As a proof, my own psychological researches confirm that people from similar communities tend to exhibit increased irritability, toxicity and desire of creating exclusive communities.

          • GolfNovemberUniform
            217·
            5 months ago

            Then they should’ve used a different word. “Incorrect opinion” is what only a toxic person would say.

            • STUPIDVIPGUY@lemmy.worldEnglish
              21·
              5 months ago

              Can you just take a second to reflect on how inelegantly you have taken being wrong? You made an incorrect assertion of a fact, just accept you made a mistake and move on. Being stubborn and defensive makes you look kind of immature.

              Hope you can take this advice

              • GolfNovemberUniform
                12·
                5 months ago

                I did admit my mistake but instead of looking at it, you just decided to falsely accuse me…

                • STUPIDVIPGUY@lemmy.worldEnglish
                  21·
                  5 months ago

                  Yes you admitted your mistake. And yes you still acted a bit foolish. That’s not a false accusation, it’s just an accusation.

                  (THIS is an example of an opinion)

                  • GolfNovemberUniform
                    12·
                    5 months ago

                    You accused me in not admitting my mistake after I admitted it. How in the world is this not a false accusation? And what does it have to do with opinions? I know people are toxic now but I’m being surprised by the stupidity of their words every day recently.

        • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          12·
          5 months ago

          Lol the fact that you think someone presenting a different opinion means they represent anyone is silly, stop perpetuating the politics = sports teams mentality

    • Substance_P@lemmy.worldEnglish
      5·
      5 months ago

      I’m all for privacy, but I’m not all for using the comment section to talk about abortion rights. Sure there is some overlap, but the comment section here seems to show the ease of which the human psyche can get distracted, these tangential bickerings are the reason big data is so effortlessly steam rolling us.

    • bloubz@lemmygrad.ml
      4·
      5 months ago

      I don’t think that’s relevant but still curious to know where you think in the Universal Declaration of human rights or in the Déclaration des droits de l’Homme et du citoyen it forbids abortion

        • bloubz@lemmygrad.ml
          5·
          5 months ago

          What are you even saying? You were talking about the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which is NOT a US text. And it is based on the Declaration from France from 1789.

          Anyway, the UDHR says that humans are born equal in rights, and that individuals have the right to live. It’s a good question to wonder what is considered an individual indeed. For example, the US law defines an individual as a human being who was born alive

          • GolfNovemberUniform
            44·
            5 months ago

            It is not a US text but it is accepted to work in the US afaik and I’m quite sure of it. Another person told me that the declaration was edited in 2018 to include the right of abortion. I didn’t know about that and I, in contrary to most people in this discussion, am not afraid to admit this and therefore the fact that I was wrong.