floofloof@lemmy.ca to PrivacyEnglish · 1 year agoGoogle will no longer hold onto people's location data in Google Maps — meaning it can't turn that info over to the policewww.businessinsider.comexternal-linkmessage-square74fedilinkarrow-up1543arrow-down17cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
arrow-up1536arrow-down1external-linkGoogle will no longer hold onto people's location data in Google Maps — meaning it can't turn that info over to the policewww.businessinsider.comfloofloof@lemmy.ca to PrivacyEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square74fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanshackernews@derp.foo
minus-squareNegativeLookBehind@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up33arrow-down2·1 year agoMaybe they don’t store it anymore, they just send it straight to the feds
minus-squarewreckedcarzz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up32·1 year agoWith the prism project ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM ) along with things like 641A ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A ), G doesn’t need to send anything. The nsa is already swallowing it whole.
minus-squareNegativeLookBehind@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down1·1 year agoConstitutional rights? You don’t need those
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoRights? You don’t need those
Maybe they don’t store it anymore, they just send it straight to the feds
With the prism project ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM ) along with things like 641A ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A ), G doesn’t need to send anything. The nsa is already swallowing it whole.
Constitutional rights? You don’t need those
Rights? You don’t need those