You must log in or # to comment.
Not even gay but this my favorite green text of all time
I remember where one about a guy who participated in a threesome. They had some dp action and his and another guy’s balls touched but it wasn’t gay. The third guy they were fucking also agreed.
If they said “no homo” before I don’t see how any of that could be considered gay.
Ha, I’m reminded of the shirt that said I’m not gay but $20 is $20
I’ve seen this a thousand times and I’ve chuckled every time.
Not even gaysuper straight
The fuck is a super straight
Someone who is so straight it becomes their entire identity.
A super-straight man only likes really manly things, like cars, guns, hunting, beer, football, men’s locker rooms, communal showers with teammates, mutual thigh massages, oil wrestling, dick measuring contests and bro jobs.But doesn’t wipe their ass cuz they can’t touch man ass for fear of not being straight any more
It’s not gay if it’s just a prank
we both laugh and I unzip his pantsgets me every time.
Its like horseshoe theory where you are so straight you turn gay af
Someone who doesn’t wash their ass because they might touch their butthole
Someone who only dates cis people of the opposite gender
It’s also a bad faith term invented by transphobes on 4chan. It was argued that “super straight” was itself a sexuality & should be included in LGBT, have their own pride stuff, etc.
*of the opposite biological sex
Cis people have the same sex and gender
deleted by creator
A person that only dates cis people is not transphobe.
A person denying trans people and being discriminative is transphobe.
Only dating cis people does not make you a transphobe, but calling yourself ‘super straight’ probably does
This is explicitly ignoring the context of the term
The question is, what is the exact reason one won’t date a trans person? Especially if it’s a post-op trans woman so there is no genital preference?
deleted by creator
Yes, in the original sense of the word you’re discriminating. That doesn’t make you a transphobe.
Sexual preference isn’t bigotry.deleted by creator
There aren’t any real differences between dating a cis woman or a trans woman
I’m all for trans rights, but there is no human right of having others be attracted to you.
Your sexual partner will be able to tell if you’re trans. In a relationship I’d expect my partner to tell me they’re trans.
And everyone is allowed to choose their sexual partners based on whatever criteria they want, cause really, attraction isn’t something you can control anyway.I mean, is it discriminative in the purest sense of the word? Yes. But people discriminate against people as intimate partners for way shallower reasons than their gender identity and it’s considered acceptable. Think height, weight, muscle mass, sizes of various body parts. Is it discriminatory? Technically. But it’s not a hate crime any more than the other reasons I listed above are in the context of choosing an intimate partner.
Not to mention one big factor that’s important to some people: the ability to have children. As of when I posted this comment, the only trans people who can have children are the ones born with a female reproductive system who haven’t had it surgically removed. This does not make any trans people less valuable as people (thinking that would be transphobic), but it does make them incompatible as intimate partners for people who do wish to have children. At least at the time this comment was posted. I’d love for this comment to be invalidated by new medical breakthroughs at some point in the future!
You’re the one being the bigot here by caring about what goes on behind someone else’s closed doors that doesn’t involve you.
We cannot judge others based on what they are attratcted to. No one is entitled to make others have an intimate relationship with them.
On case contrary, if a person doesn’t want to work with trans people or dont want to be friends with them, that’s being transphobic
That’s not how the real world works and I encourage you to step away from Tumblr or whatever the kids are using these days. I transitioned in the mid 00’s and this virtue signalling of “YOU MUST DATE TRANS PEOPLE OR UR TRANSPHOBIC!!” is a very recent trend that has no bearing on reality, and in fact only divides us further. Just let people date who they want to date.
Thank fuck this is being seen for the ridiculous sanctimony that it is.
Unless it involves (children and/or animals;vulnerable) we shouldn’t care about who someone else prefers to date regardless of if we approve it or not. The live and let live rule should apply to more than just congress.
Yes you are. You discriminate all the time with things and people because you are free to choose the things you enjoy or it’s practical in a given situation. For example, if you choose to go to work in a car then you’re discriminating bicycles, and if you choose to go walking you’re discriminating both cars and bicycles. Needless to say, this won’t make you a carphobe, if it’s just practical or if you just enjoy to walk. Unless, you are really afraid of getting into cars.
You can like trans people, but if you are not comfortable around penises or vaginas or the lack of one of these, it is what it is. I mean that’s the whole point of respecting diversity. What would be the difference between forcing any person to live with a transgender person and a cisman forced to be in a straight marriage? I don’t see one. I think the bigot position is to force a given behavior to people, as if it was a sacred norm.
Blanket statements like this which just paints everyone under it in a negative light is what pushes people away from actually listening to anything you could have to say.
I see your argument, and, partly, I do agree, though in this case “super straight” IS a label made by transphobes, for transphobes
You are taking a greentext too seriously.
You know it wasn’t made in this greentext
Fair enough
Something like this… but maybe with less acceptance.
That was fucking hilarious
As soon as I saw super straight, I knew it was going to be as gay as it gets. Love this green text every time 🤣
Real talk homies. How desperate would you as a straight man have to be to use a glory hole, knowing probably a man would be doing the sucking?
As a straight man, I think I’d have to be pretty desperate. But in any case, I’d first talk about it with my straight husband.
I’m not concerned about whether it’s a guy or a girl sucking at a gloryhole, but I’m concerned about what STIs a gloryhole sucker might bring
This is totally typical. You know why?
1 - It’s easy to show up and get serviced, no sweat. 2 - Gay dudes give the bests blowjobs. 🧑🏼 3 - And… 'Cause the “straight male” actually enjoy doing it…
Real talk my dudes. How much more homophobic can this guy get?
He could have been more sensitive but there is nothing homophobic about just being straight. He didn’t make any judgements about gay people, or any other disenfranchised group. His judgement/curiosity is towards straight males.
If you are bi curious and want to go to a glory hole and get excited about not knowing who is doing the service then guess what? You’re a beautiful person but you aren’t straight. So his question had nothing to do with you.
His question was for someone who has the same sexuality as him. It seems like he feels a specific way about something that comes from his sexuality and is wondering what the circumstances would be to make someone else that feels just like him about it to actually go through with it.
Homophobic? Dude, I’m gay.
if you read again youll read that the green texter was doing the sucking
While it’s not directly referring to the joke, I don’t think the question implies he missed it. Just a question that popped up because of the topic in said joke
I mean it’s pretty obvious, that someone going to get oral sex with another man is not straight, so the entire question is redundant and reeks of “no homo” straight culture.
I’d would have to lose the use of both my arms first and then who knows what might end up happening.
deleted by creator
Probably not the best subr… SubLemmy(?) to ask this question. It’s important right now to be sensitive for our disenfranchised homies.
Without looking at your previous posts I’m giving the benefit of the doubt that you didn’t mean anything negative by it. So hear me when I tell you that saying things that could even just “possibly” be misinterpreted as something negative will absolutely be taken personally. The past hundred+ years have been completely fucking horrendous for gay people, so until we go back to freely fucking and sucking anyone without judgement, the people who are used to being oppressed for said fucking and sucking are going to be a little sensitive when you say something that might be misinterpreted into you thinking they should be oppressed.
Point taken, thanks. I’m actually gay and was genuinely curious.
What a curve ball
Tl/dr
It wasn’t for you.
Fake: Super straights (as originally conceived by transphobes) aren’t attracted to trans people like they’re not attracted to the same gender. It’d be nearly impossible to find a dick that isn’t connected to a trans person or a man, meaning he somehow avoided thinking about it until the guy moaned. The sheer stupidity is unlikely, so it’s probably satire.
Gay: Not necessarily, as enbies and transfems can have dicks and still use a masculine voice, so sucking that dick could be heterosexual. However, it’s more likely to be gay than not gay, as most people with penises and masculine voices identify as men.
Calm down son, it’s just a drawing
That’s the joke 😑
