The vaccines are obviously safe, but can someone explain 2021 data from openvaers?

Or maybe we should ignore data in the interest of science.

    • मुक्तOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      And you fail to explain every time why should that matter when the data being analyzed is aggregate of all vaccines.

      What exactly is different about covid vaccines? Why should they be seggregated from other vaccines for your purposes?

        • मुक्तOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          Different vaccines, different reactions.

          How is this a good argument?
          Every vaccine is a different vaccine when it is first developed. Has a different reaction. You appear to be saying the same thing about covid vaccines.

          Since each vaccine is different and has different reaction, vaccines are tested over years, sometimes decades, before they are labelled safe. I recall reading about a vaccine which was found to be causing fatal side effects after 27 years of examining, and officially stopped only after that.

          Since mRNA is an untested technology, a rational mind would ask more questions about it, not less. Seek answers. To accept it on basis of faith without due testing, due questioning, and due skeptical thought is textbook example of cult behaviour.

          • sexy_peach@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 years ago

            We aren’t against asking more questions. Especially people in the field should totally investigate if the vaccines are safe. They currently think that they are safe though, so that’s my opinion as well.

            • मुक्तOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              Until 1990’s, argument from authority was automatically disqualified as an argument. Unless you defend what these “people in the field” are saying, you are commiting a logical fallacy.