• AgreeableLandscape
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 years ago

      Honestly yeah. Getting experimental numbers in a lab does not a production ready battery make.

      • Ephera
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        And if it does increase the effective capacity twofold, that still won’t mean that your phone will actually run twice as long, because we’ll rather just stop optimizing our software so much.

        That will have other advantages, like more features, cheaper apps etc., but it won’t stand out as much.

        • AgreeableLandscape
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          Also, chances are doubling the capacity will double the explosion risk. All that energy isn’t coming from nothing, it’s stored as chemicals that really want to release that energy.

  • loki
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 years ago

    still waiting for those graphene batteries

  • esmitt
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 years ago

    Agree with the previous comments on this repetitious story. The one step spray-pyrolysis does sound promising. Marrying this anode with the rest of the materials probably needs to be sorted out because I bet that anode is remarkably brittle, but I also assume the current porous carbon is as well. Just 5 more years :-)