My favourite part of the holding your baby fee story is that whenever the photo makes the rounds on reddit or wherever, people try to explain the situation, i.e. relay the explanation the PR department of the hospital issued. The “explanation” is that the regular procedure is to take the baby away immediately for medical reasons I don’t remember. Either the hospital is lying and this was a bullshit charge people with a newborn couldn’t object to, or they really have an inhuman procedure that charges a new mother for one of the most human things she can do. I don’t even know which would be worse.
I don’t think I ever heard the justification, but I certainly don’t understand that. They said that they normally take the baby away for medical reasons, or that this particular baby needed to be taken away for medical reasons? And if it’s for medical reasons, why are they willing to override their medical reasons for $40?
I mean, I’m sure there’s a host of checking they do on a newborn (I’m not the child-having type and I’m not that kind of doctor, so it’s never come up). What I’m saying is that it’s obviously not a medical emergency, or paying $40 to hold your baby wouldn’t be an option. So it’s probably because the hospital charges the fee because the staff member waits to start the process, right? But that’s exactly what’s absolutely ludicrous. You’re already paying how many tens of thousands of dollars for the delivery, why tack on just that little bit? It’s not even a fraction of a percent, not to mention not letting the baby be held is inhumane to both the mother and the child. It’s like a fine dining restaurant charging you $5 if you ask the waiter for a few more minutes to look at the menu.
My favourite part of the holding your baby fee story is that whenever the photo makes the rounds on reddit or wherever, people try to explain the situation, i.e. relay the explanation the PR department of the hospital issued. The “explanation” is that the regular procedure is to take the baby away immediately for medical reasons I don’t remember. Either the hospital is lying and this was a bullshit charge people with a newborn couldn’t object to, or they really have an inhuman procedure that charges a new mother for one of the most human things she can do. I don’t even know which would be worse.
deleted by creator
And then a liberal one so they can tell us it is selfish to want kids. But of course both just mean “don’t be poor, peasant”.
I don’t think I ever heard the justification, but I certainly don’t understand that. They said that they normally take the baby away for medical reasons, or that this particular baby needed to be taken away for medical reasons? And if it’s for medical reasons, why are they willing to override their medical reasons for $40?
I mean, I’m sure there’s a host of checking they do on a newborn (I’m not the child-having type and I’m not that kind of doctor, so it’s never come up). What I’m saying is that it’s obviously not a medical emergency, or paying $40 to hold your baby wouldn’t be an option. So it’s probably because the hospital charges the fee because the staff member waits to start the process, right? But that’s exactly what’s absolutely ludicrous. You’re already paying how many tens of thousands of dollars for the delivery, why tack on just that little bit? It’s not even a fraction of a percent, not to mention not letting the baby be held is inhumane to both the mother and the child. It’s like a fine dining restaurant charging you $5 if you ask the waiter for a few more minutes to look at the menu.
Please tell me I’m missing something.