I’m lol’d. Can’t even say the comment with a straight face!

  • JohnBrownEnjoyer@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 years ago

    “Forcible suppression of opposition”.

    So by their own criteria, liberals are fascists— beginning with the French Revolution, in which they killed and suppressed the feudal ruling class and its institutions, and with more modern or recent examples including COINTELPRO or the U.S. police brutalizing BLM protestors in 2020.

    • Anarcho-Bolshevik@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      Don’t forget the so‐called American Revolution and both sides of the U.S. Civil War, where the material conditions once again took precedence over liberal ideology. Forcible suppression of opposition is a means to an end, not vice versa. That’s partly why I’ve been studying and discussing Fascism more, because equating it with violent suppression is a popular oversimplification and a classic case of confusing the tail for the dog.

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      They disavowed French Revolution even before it finished. As they did with every other bourgeois (their!) revolution. Marx explain this in his two books about France 1848-1850, and Lenin was saying like every 10 pages in 1905-1917 that liberals need to be dragged by proletariat to fight even for their own interests, and the moment they get any fake crumb from landlords they instantly turn counterrevolutionary.