I am a Linux noobie and have only used Mint for around six months now. While I have definitely learned a lot, I don’t have the time to always be doing crazy power user stuff and just want something that works out of the box. While I love Mint, I want to try out other decently easy to use distros as well, specifically not based on Ubuntu, so no Pop OS. Is Manjaro a possibly good distro for me to check out?

  • Gush
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Debian unstable best for gaming

    • taladar@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Debian sid/unstable isn’t even a real distro, it is just a staging area for testing. No care is taken to keep packages added to it compatible, that is literally where packages go to achieve that compatibility before they go to Debian testing and/or stable. It does not get security updates either.

      • selokichtli
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You don’t need security updates when you are using the latest version of a package. That’s the security model that all rolling release distros use. Security comes from upstream development, from devs patching their software as soon as they find vulnerabilities. If this is more or less secure than the Debian Stable approach is up for your use case.

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Packages with fixes are often in Debian Security before they are in unstable though because nobody cares about security fixes for unstable. They just update the packages there when they need a new version as part of their regular workflow. It is not like a rolling release distro.

          • selokichtli
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I didn’t say it was a rolling release distro. The security model of their packages is one of a rolling release distro but the distribution is unstable, not rolling. The thing I find plainly absurd is to ask a security repo from the unstable branch of a distro, or from a rolling release distro.

      • Gush
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know about security updates, but what you just described in the first sentences is literally the definition of an unstable release

        • taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, unstable just means it isn’t tested, not that people literally do not pay attention to version constraints when assembling a collection of packages.