• Hot Saucerman
    link
    English
    216
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’ll be honest, the fact that our “justice” system is on the fence about whether or not we should prosecute a former President just shows how much of a fucking sham the entire fucking system is. The fact that the DOJ sat on it at first and only decided to go forward because he kept committing fucking crimes because he can’t help himself is fucking disgusting. They did everything they could to let him go with a slap on the wrist. Fucking sickening.

    We may as well still have fucking Monarchy if they’re not willing to actually prosecute prolifically criminal motherfuckers like this.

    In other words, yes, I agree with the title. It’s the most important criminal prosecution in US history because finally after 60-some fucking years of non-stop corruption, we’re finally even considering doing something about it.

    • @Cruxifux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3510 months ago

      Rich people rarely pay for their crimes. It essentially is a monarchy, just with different justifications for us to serve the ruling class.

        • Unaware7013
          link
          fedilink
          2510 months ago

          Wouldn’t it be more of a plutocracy since the wealthy are basically ruling us?

          • @FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            6
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I think you could make a case for either one. Wealth isn’t really an indicator of power though although all the powerful do have wealth. What I do know is that it certainly doesn’t feel like a democratic republic. How could it when the elected get to choose the electors?

    • HobbitFoot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2110 months ago

      We’ve never really seen an American President as criminal as Trump before. There is some precedent with Nixon and Clinton, but nothing to the level that Trump did.

      That said, this needs to be done.

        • HobbitFoot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3210 months ago

          Both had legal troubles during and after their presidencies, indicating some form of precedent.

          This isn’t equating or comparing the severity of legal problems, just noting that they existed.

          • @Anticorp
            link
            510 months ago

            Ice is present in both my glass of water and the Arctic circle, but they otherwise have no similarities. The same is true for Clinton and Trump’s presidencies including their legal troubles.

      • Hot Saucerman
        link
        English
        8
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        There’s been precedent with nearly every president since Nixon. I’d maybe leave out Jimmy Carter, but even has skeletons in his closet. Reagan, Bush, Bush II, and Obama all had scandals and criminality that were minimized. I find it odd that people don’t realize that Obama continued some of the worst aspects of the Bush administration. It’s why I pegged it at sixty years. There was absolutely corruption before Nixon, too, but it became more egregious after him.

        EDIT: Getting downvotes because I guess people have rosy memories of Obama? Obama told me whose team he was on the second he said “We need to look forward, not backward” at not prosecuting anyone in the Bush admin for lying to the world about WMD’s and leading us into an illegal and wasteful war in the middle east, a war that Obama ramped up drone warfare in. As if that wasn’t a precedent of ignoring Republican crimes that lead us to exactly where we are fucking now with everyone treating Trump with kid gloves. Bush and Cheney are literal fucking war criminals, and people cooed over how cute it was that Bush shared candy with Michelle Obama. Give me a break. That shit is precisely what lead us here, treating war criminals with kid gloves.

        • @Anticorp
          link
          18
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          He didn’t just ignore Bush’s crimes, he chose to continue them. He actively and consciously chose to continue the Patriot Act, unconstitutional imprisonment of American citizens, unconstitutional surveillance, and unconstitutional and illegal torture. Obama’s presidency was world’s better than Trump’s, but Obama was every bit the authoritarian police-state enforcer as his predecessors.

        • Poggervania
          link
          fedilink
          910 months ago

          Honestly, it just goes to show that most American citizens don’t really give a shit about politics. So long as the person in charge has the right letter by their name, that’s all that matters to the majority of the US because then they can go “the guy in charge has the same letter I support and like, they can do no wrong because I can’t be wrong!

          • @pingveno
            link
            English
            6
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I think most Americans would like to have a system that gives them real choice instead of the political duopoly. We just aren’t there in terms of having viable parties outside of a duopoly because of FPTP. There’s slow movement in the direction, but only very slow.

          • Saik0
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 months ago

            It shows in this thread that that’s the case heavily…

            Also the weird illogical bullshit that “One side is incompetent, one is criminal and actively malicious”… like that’s sufficient… Is it too much to strive for neither of these things? The schism in peoples minds on this matter is absurd.

        • @Faresh
          link
          English
          710 months ago

          I think we can say that practically all American presidents in history were despicable human beings.

          • Hot Saucerman
            link
            English
            11
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Yeah the guys who said “all men are created equal” while giving themselves rights to own other humans as property, and only allowing land-owning white men the right to vote, those guys were “good guys?” Right? Right?? /s

            It would probably be more clear to say we had a handful in the middle (like maybe one or two really) who weren’t total complete utter pieces of shit. Like LBJ and maybe Ike (mostly for his farewell address and how prescient it was), but even with the good things they did, they were also pretty big pieces of shit in their own ways.

            • DigitalTraveler42
              link
              fedilink
              English
              510 months ago

              Leading nation-states isn’t a black and white thing, there’s always going to be decisions that have to be made based on the information those leaders have at that moment and sometimes those decisions have negative consequences.

              However with that being said there has never been an American president that was an outright corrupt traitor like Trump was, he was purely out for himself and selling the rest of us out to the probably not even the highest bidder, probably more the bidder that was the best at sucking up to Trump or promising him the best stuff.

              • Hot Saucerman
                link
                English
                10
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                However with that being said there has never been an American president that was an outright corrupt traitor like Trump was

                My brother in Christ, that’s literally my point. It took literally the most absolutely corrupt and endlessly shameless idiot on the planet to actually make our government consider prosecuting anyone in the upper echelons of government for clear crimes. It’s fucking sickening that it took this obscene level of criminality for it to become something worth doing something about, and they tried their hardest to softwalk it and give him chances to return the documents! Who knows if we’d even have the J6 case if it wasn’t for the documents fiasco!

        • Saik0
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -2710 months ago

          And even the current president has been found to do about half of what Trump is being brought to court for… Plus the whole nonsense with Hunter. They’re all corrupt crooks that have all undermined our country for their own gains.

          • Retro
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3010 months ago

            The only thing close to what Trump has done that Biden was involved with is when there were some classified documents found, which were promptly returned. Unlike Trump, who purposefully and knowingly took classified documents, left them unsecured in his resort, bragged about it, and refused to return them when requested.

            Biden also didn’t stage a coup or lie about and try to manipulate election results.

            So, like, no where close to “half” of what Trump has done. If you actually believe that, you’re a fucking moron.

            And who gives a shit about Hunter. He’s not even a public official, unlike Ivanka and Jared Kushner were during Trump’s presidency where they promptly used their positions for personal gain…

            Quit with the both sides bullshit and read a fucking book.

              • Retro
                link
                fedilink
                English
                210 months ago

                Sorry, I was more referring to Biden’a classified docs that were found. Trump’s offenses are on a whole other scale, but there’s at least a modicum of similarity there to compare.

                • @AbidanYre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  410 months ago

                  I know. I was just commenting on the difference between the handful of documents that apparently every former President/VP has ended up with accidentally versus Trump’s stacks of boxes he was hoarding and showing off to guests.

              • @Falmarri@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1110 months ago

                This is actually just as bad, if not worse than what Trump did.

                Lol wtf?

                It is literally both sides. And you’re a fucking moron if you believe otherwise.

                Yes. One side is incompetent, one is criminal and actively malicious

                • spaceghotiOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  210 months ago

                  I’ve learned not to dignify “enlightened centrists” with a reply. It just helps them feed their bad narratives.

                • Saik0
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -310 months ago

                  Wonderful! Thanks for agreeing that both sides are literally bad. Thanks.

          • @Anticorp
            link
            810 months ago

            Dude! Just saying things doesn’t make them true. Stop blindly repeating easily disproven lies you hear on Fox news.

            • @TheMage
              link
              -610 months ago

              As soon as you stop believing the easily disproven lies you are getting from The View, MSNBC and CNN. Cool?

            • Saik0
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -710 months ago

              I don’t watch fox news. Good try. And if it’s so easily disproven… feel free to go ahead and line by line disprove it.

              • @AbidanYre@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                9
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                And even the current president has been found to do about half of what Trump is being brought to court for…

                No he hasn’t.

                Plus the whole nonsense with Hunter.

                Isn’t even a complete thought.

                They’re all corrupt crooks that have all undermined our country for their own gains.

                A thoughtless platitude.

                There’s your line by line rebuttal with just as much thought and evidence behind it as your original comment.

                • Saik0
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -110 months ago

                  https://lemmy.saik0.com/comment/546464

                  Literally all complete and explainable thoughts. You might want to actually learn to read a bit better… or follow the topic a bit better if you’re going to argue against people on the matter.

              • @Anticorp
                link
                710 months ago

                The obligation is yours to prove your claims, not mine to disprove random wild allegations.

                • Saik0
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  0
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Well known facts that need to be proved. But fine, no problem.

                  Most of those documents were when he was still a Senator. He should not have had them without the courier to begin with.

                  https://www.npr.org/2023/01/14/1149071576/biden-classified-documents-what-we-know

                  This is actually just as bad, if not worse than what Trump did. But there’s this belligerent bunch of people who can’t parse this fact.

                  This is an opinion and doesn’t require “facts” to back it up

                  So how many counts and for what is Trump facing? Hint… it’s literally half of those cases are related to “documents”…

                  https://www.newsweek.com/full-list-donald-trumps-three-indictments-78-felony-charges-1816951

                  Answer is 78 counts. 37 are documents related. or… 47%… roughly half.

                  The same shit that Biden has done.

                  See first link. I can get more if you want… but I think we both know that it’s true.

                  But there’s this belligerent bunch of people who can’t parse this fact.

                  https://lemmy.ml/comment/2194169
                  https://lemmy.world/comment/1989593
                  https://lemmy.world/comment/1990015

                  You guys are so belligerently dumb about this you can’t even parse that it’s virtually the same laws broken. Just one asshat was also loud about it. You guys have proven the point yourselves, no need for me to source anything else.

                  Which is the other half of the shit Trump is being charge for… Keep up kid.

                  See above… where 37/78 is ~50%.

                  Considering that it’s obvious and clear at this point that the President knew about it… and lied to the public about it. You should care.

                  This one is fun… https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/analysis-hunter-bidens-hard-drive-shows-firm-took-11-million-2013-2018-rcna29462
                  https://www.washingtonpost.com/podcasts/post-reports/the-story-of-hunter-bidens-dealings-in-ukraine/

                  Guy has no history of doing the job… Gets sent to do the job in a foreign country. This is obvious nepotism in overseas dealings. Yet Biden has continuously claimed to have no idea about any of his sons foreign dealings. I could provide probably dozens of examples of this including much more recent stuff. But I’m more curious if you’re just going to argue in bad faith.

                  I’ve read plenty of books.

                  I used to be a College Professor… I’ve WRITTEN books. Let alone how many I’ve read…

                  Seems that you need some help with education though.

                  Opinion.

                  It is literally both sides. And you’re a fucking moron if you believe otherwise.

                  Self-evident, and snarky response to your bullshit.

                  Enough evidence for you? I’m not sure how you could be arguing in this thread at all if you didn’t even know about the simple facts I’ve linked here. This isn’t me needing to provide “evidence”… it was you being too fucking lazy to keep up with the discussion overall before injecting your bullshit 2 cents.

                  Edit: Typo

    • @TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      1110 months ago

      Honestly, it seems like just the Republicans and right-wing media are on the fence.

      Any other media person and non republican is “charge his ass and if guilty, throw him in a hole”

    • @BigNote@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      610 months ago

      Hard disagree. Far more than anything else, this is about audience capture and the failure of Burke’s “fourth estate.” What it shows is the efficacy of segregated information ecosystems that have near total audience capture. None of this would be even remotely possible if all Americans lived and swam in the same information ecosystem.

      But we don’t, and we are seeing what this means for the health of democracy and the rule of law.

      Conservatives, having the luxury of an unquestioning audience that’s fully captured by an information ecosystem that’s fully on-board with anything they say, are not constrained in any way by the truth.

      The Press, with a capital P, no longer serves as a check against conservative lies because, due to the nearly complete segregation of information ecosystems, any facts that run count er to the conservative agenda can simply be ignored or twisted, and will accordingly never be seen by a conservative audience at all.

      All of which is just to say that while our justice system is imperfect, the real problem is the corruption of Burke’s fourth estate which was always conceived of as necessarily existing in opposition to, or at least as a check against, governmental and private commercial power.

      • @YeeterOfWorlds@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        110 months ago

        But we don’t, and we are seeing what this means for the health of democracy and the rule of law.

        If you’re going to blame multiple news sources/commentators (that all Americans do not swim in the same information ecosystem), wouldn’t it then become a matter of whether or not democracy itself is a viable system?

        As in, if the only way a democracy can remain healthy is if all citizen “lived and swam in the same information ecosystem.”, Then how would it be possible to have a democracy? Like, how do we have a free healthy democracy, and enforce the existence of a singular “information ecosystem” at the same time? That sounds impossible.

  • btaf45
    link
    fedilink
    6410 months ago

    Reminder that Steve Bannon frankly confessed Trump’s Start the Steal conspiracy plans to a group of Trump insiders before the election.

    https://www.npr.org/2022/07/22/1112138665/jan-6-committee-hearing-transcript

    …audio from Trump advisor, Steve Bannon, surfaced from October 31st, 2020, just a few days before the Presidential election.

    Let’s listen. [Begin Videotape]

    STEVE BANNON: And what Trump’s going to do is declare victory, right? He’s going to declare victory, but that doesn’t mean he’s a winner. He’s just gonna say he’s a winner. The Democrats — more of our people vote early that count. Theirs vote in mail. And so they’re going to have a natural disadvantage and Trump’s going to take advantage — that’s our strategy.

    He’s gonna declare himself a winner. So when you wake up Wednesday morning, it’s going to be a firestorm. Also — also if Trump is — if Trump is losing by 10 or 11:00 at night, it’s going to be even crazier. Because he’s gonna sit right there and say they stole it. If Biden’s wining, Trump is going to do some crazy shit.

  • @Risus_Nex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1310 months ago

    As an outsider of US politics and stuff, it appears to me that all those charges against Trump seem to happen at the same time now. Is this intentional or simply because that’s how long it took? I guess it will be very expensive for Trump and it will also most likely result in him getting confused by his own lies in front of court. Let’s hope he will finally be prosecuted for at least some of his crimes and won’t be able to run for president again. He made enough damage to the US and the world in general.

        • spaceghotiOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          Merrick Garland dragged his feet, more concerned with accusations of partisanship than the public good. FTA:

          From the outset of his tenure atop the Justice Department, Attorney General Merrick Garland evinced little interest in mounting any such investigation, fearing that the GOP’s permanently aggrieved MAGA base would view it as a weaponized, partisan effort to hound Trump into political irrelevance.

    • BiggestBulb
      link
      fedilink
      710 months ago

      It’s both intentional and a result of how long it took.

      Depending on where you live in the US, it can take years to be seen.

      There’s definitely a lot of people actively defending Trump though, which is also a large reason behind the lag in justice.

    • @Anticorp
      link
      410 months ago

      I don’t think money is a concern for trump, given how much of it he extracted from American tax payers through Secret Service bills, and missing covid relief funds.

    • @MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      210 months ago

      I don’t think he’s gonna try to lie that much at this point, at least not lies meant to portray innocence . I think he’s gonna focus on outrage, riling up the whackos who think this behavior is acceptable and warranted. I imagine we’ll hear a lot about the usual stuff like “witch hunt”, “deep state”, etc. He’s gonna be pretty blatant about his motives cause he knows he’s got. He will attempt to incite violence and perhaps even squeak out a few whatabouts to try and drag a few other corrupt rich people down with him. I dunno, it’s gonna be interesting, sadly.

    • Unaware7013
      link
      fedilink
      1110 months ago

      This is still early in the process, so there may be a superceding indictment that includes that as well. But at this point, I think they’re trying to go for the easy to prove shit to help flip his cronies so they can get an airtight case on it.

    • @hglman
      link
      English
      110 months ago

      I suspect they will; the house recommended it.

  • @pingveno
    link
    English
    1210 months ago

    Nixon was the most important criminal prosecution that should have happened. I fully understand the Ford wanted Nixon out of the headlines so he could move on to governing. But at the same time, it established a glow of immunity (even impunity) around even former presidents. In so many ways, Nixon paved the way for Trump, with Reagan and Iran-Contra extending the principle.

  • StarServal
    link
    fedilink
    1110 months ago

    That thumbnail is hilarious. It looks like someone put the skin on the mesh the wrong way around.

    • spaceghotiOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 months ago

      Honestly, I would love to see him put away in prison for the rest of his natural life, and see the fruits of his grifting utterly destroyed. But if I can’t have that, death by natural causes also works.

  • @MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    110 months ago

    Daytime reality TV drama following orange man’s prison escapades incoming. Just kidding, he won’t go to actual jail. More like a gated retirement home with all the perks.

  • @theroz
    link
    English
    -110 months ago

    The first line, "Two and a half years ago, Americans of good conscience… "

    I’m sure this won’t be a biased article.

    • funkless
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 months ago

      how unbiased can you be against things that are obviously wrong? “but what about all the good things Vlad the Impaler did?!”

      • @Hexadecimalkink
        link
        -210 months ago

        Trump sucked but the tactics the media uses to make Trump supporters look bad only serves to push them farther away from what the author considers “good conscience”

        • @Wodge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 months ago

          I dunno, they tend to support things like taking away rights from folk, so that makes them pretty bad people to begin with.

    • krzschlss
      link
      fedilink
      Gaeilge
      310 months ago

      It is not.

      US governments should be tried for war crimes and other hijinks. Trump and his golf buddies Hillary, Obama and George and their respective Governments should be tried for drone bombing, civilian massacres (called Collateral damage when US military does it), concentration camps, carpet bombing, corruption on global level, one-sidedness in media reporting, history revisionism and similar fun activities. All paid by a bizarre, medicated, clueless, propaganda-fed nation that thinks a media-run and industry-sponsored dictatorship can be called an Empire, even though it has no cultural identity worth spreading or remembering. All the while calling it Democracy during the Superbowl halftime show while they sell you cheap shitty products and feed you industry high-grade sugar while you sing your national hymn and jerk off to Beyonce’s twerking… while saving the Amazon Forest and Hong Kong… and saving the Kurds and Palestinians (RIP)…

      That would be the most important one. And a fun one!

  • @Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -210 months ago

    The president in particular is very much a figure head - he wields no real power whatsoever. He is apparently chosen by the government, but the qualities he is required to display are not those of leadership, but those of finely judged outrage. For this reason the President is always a fascinating character. On those criteria Donald Trump is one of the most successful presidents the US has ever had. He has already spent 4 of his 8 potential presidential years being investigated for fraud.

    • Kit Sorens
      link
      fedilink
      English
      210 months ago

      It’s not that qualities like leadership and morality are required for the Presidency, it is the implicit understanding that the American people, as a whole, would filter those men and women with the best qualities among the populace to the top. However, instead, we have a hijacked political system where only 2 lobby-chosen candidates do not need to convince the populace of their leadership skills, only that they’re not as bad as the other guy. The 2 party establishment killed the presidency.