Ive heard this and and only started to pay attention to world events two years ago so I don’t know if this is true or not

  • Cyclohexane
    link
    172 years ago

    Syrian here. It’s hard to say, but most likely not. We are yet to see valid evidence that the Syrian government committed the attacks, and there’s actually some evidence to support them.

  • AdvancedAktion
    link
    fedilink
    11
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    If the source is ‘UN said so’, I dn’t have any counterpoint. Its hard to believe that Assad will use chemical weapon when he is about to win back the territory and then make it easy for UN to inspect there. I guess he is a stupid evil dictator. My bad.

  • @jacktrowell@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    82 years ago

    Probably not, he had no reason to use them, especially when already winning, while the rebels knew that any use (real or not) of chemical weapons would give the US justifications for sanctions of other interventions, and every instance of supposed use of chemical weapons happenned in areas held by the rebels, or were “revealed” by the rebels-and-NATO-aligned white helmets, or similar suscpiscious contexts.

  • @OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    72 years ago

    Check out Aaron Mate’s work on debunking the Syrian chemical attacks. The US basically pressured the OPCW into blaming Syria, against the conclusion that the attacks were staged to look like they happened from an aircraft, but they were set up on the ground. OPCW investigators who were involved whistle blower the truth.

    • @Rafael_Luisi@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      102 years ago

      Of course i am not trusting the UN, as Assad said one time, “thats not proff, thats the exact opposite of it, why should we take in consideration what the US says?”

        • @Rafael_Luisi@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          112 years ago

          Wow, an country that hates said guy try to cover the truth and chooses to say he did it anyways, Do you purposefully choose to not think or does that come naturally?

          I think you are lost sir, the liberal circle jerk groups are on reddit.

            • @Rafael_Luisi@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              102 years ago

              Yes it is, its base is on the US, almost every decision is decided by him, why do you think the UN dont do shit about any crime the US and his goons commit but immediatly jumps on any non western country? Its an US tool, same shit for the EU and NATO, just another arm of the US, if you cant see something as obvious as that, then you are very lost here.

                • @Rafael_Luisi@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  112 years ago

                  It is as real as the Saddam Hussain WMDs and gadaffi being an dictator. Show the fucking proff instead of repeating the same shit, if the only proff you have about something as serious as that comes from the UN, then it is definitivly maded up. UN is worthless, i did not see it going to ukraine to show the nazis killing thousands on Donbass, i dont see it doing shit about the US sentencing more then a million Afegan children to die by starvation, i did not see such fight for human rights over literally everything the US has ever done since the UN was founded. Fuck off with this “muh human rights” shit, unless you show some actual proff, you are just supporting lies told by the US here.