• bcgm3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 minutes ago

    Just you wait…

    • 2024: Wicked (Part 1)
    • 2025: Wicked Part 2 (Part 1)
    • 2026: Wicked Part 2 (Part 2)
  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    13 minutes ago

    I really don’t care anymore … when a new movie is announced, I really don’t care to do anything special to go out and see it. I just forget about it and wait a year or two and watch it as a stream on one of the services I already pay for.

    It usually works out. If the movie was crap, everyone will tell me, I’ll read about it or see low review scores for and just never bother watching it ever … or it’s released on Netflix, Disney or Amazon and I watch it there a year or two later.

    If it has great reviews and not available anywhere, then I just wait a year and rent it for $5 and watch it at home.

    There’s more than enough content to last a lifetime, I’m not spending any more money to watch the latest greatest movie as soon as it comes out.

  • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Oh lord. This did not need to be a two parter. Man, I miss movies being well contained 90 minute stories.

    • ditty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      The whole Broadway show can be done in a 2 hour-ish performance live, there is no justification to stretch this to two movies other than corporate greed milking every IP to the limit

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        From everything I’ve seen so far about Wicked the movie(s), yes that’s exactly what it is.

        The show is still touring folks, go see the show if you can

    • ME5SENGER_24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Unless its a planned trilogy with 3 strong stories that could semi-standalone (short of context being lost without the other installments) then any movie that needs more than 2 hours should just be a mini series. You wanna tell a 4 hour long story about the Wizard of Oz? Fine, stick it on Netflix and anyone who wants to binge watch it can to make it “feel like a movie” and those who don’t will have 4 - hour long episodes.

    • Flamekebab@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’m starting to suspect that this is why I don’t watch as many films as I’d like to. They’ve all become such a time commitment. Show me what you can do with an hour and a half!

  • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 hours ago

    This did have PART 1 early in reveal but then realized people wouldn’t see it so they lied about this being a complete movie. Mission Impossible Dead Reckoning did the same thing

    • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      People aren’t going to see a movie that lies about it being a part 1 either, at least not after the first weekend when the word gets out

      • paraphrand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Yeah, they scrubbed it from the title once it was on digital/streaming for awhile.

        Here’s what AppleTV looks like:

        • burgersc12@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I think this has more to do with the next one being the Final Reckoning instead of “dead reckoning part 2”

          • paraphrand@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            28 minutes ago

            Well, that means they pivoted either way. Still strange, and still likely all about marketing and not wanting anything dissuading people from diving in.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I’m still bitter about Spider-Man. Had no idea it was a part one until it ended. Maybe we just create whole movies with the 2+ hours we are using.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I don’t think they were even making part 2 when they ended it that way. Made it so much worse.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Same, caught it on a plane and was pissed I had to keep sitting there not knowing the actual ending

      • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        The second spider-verse movie, I think. No mention of it being a trilogy but the story clearly ended setting up a third movie.

        • bassomitron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Those movies were already too long, IMO. The shortest of the two is 114 minutes. My son really liked them, but we had to break up each movie into more than one session.

            • bassomitron@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 minutes ago

              Oh I don’t mind it as much; but, for an animated movie that’s somewhat geared towards a wider age demographic range, it felt a bit too long for younger viewers.