Just a post to say the goods of using SimpleX instead of others “private” messenger. First it doesn’t not require any id, phone number, etc… Can create how many accounts that you want! Decentralized servers, everyone can run and use own servers, and communicate with others! Big privacy side! Look at this one of the best https://privacyspreadsheet.com/messaging-apps. The only negative is the usability of the app, this is why it needs support and be democratize to gain attraits to people, and maybe one day be one the most used messenger app…

  • ISOmorph@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Simplex is pretty nice, but to me XMPP already does all that you described, and metadata isn’t that important to me. Plus XMPP has better clients for mobile and desktop

    • foremanguyOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      For 1:1 and small groups, XMPP is not as convenient + not as secure

      • andylicious1337@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        but why isnt it secure? if you know that the other person is using the same version of omemo it is secure. and if you are self-hosting it, meta-data is no issue either

        • kixik
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          Actually xmpp is low on metadata compared to matrix which has to replicate a bunch of metadata everywhere. SimpleX look interesting, though by not being federated (considered by simpleX a privacy feature) whether you like their client or not. Just so you know privacyguides has explained why they don’t advertise xmpp as privacy oriented, and the reason is not that it isn’t, it’s simply that given it’s federated, they consider some clients are not as compliant or up to date, which is up to the user to select on XMPP, and also up to the user to file bugs against their preferred client or even contribute it with changes.

          • zod000
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            My stance is that XMPP and Matrix are only private if you self host and don’t federate. That really cuts down on who may want to use them, but it can be great for a small community, company, or family assuming you can get everyone to buy in.

      • toastal
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        My battery life & ability self-host on low-spec hardware is pretty convenient. When I talk to my bud on their own self-hosted, low-spec instance, the TLS+OMEMO is pretty secure since we don’t have to trust some third-party server provider with data/metadata.

        • foremanguyOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Right, and completely agreed with that, but I think that SimpleX is just better in most cases (not on battery life for now), as it could be also self hosted

          • toastal
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            There is a cost aspect of self-hosting that one has to comtemplate. I haven’t looked at SimpleX hosting, but if it’s anything like Matrix on resources, it isn’t accessible or feasible even if it is possible.

            • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I host a Simplex server, it is not that bad in terms of resources. My smp server is around 90 MB RAM and XFTP is 30 MB. Could be better, but still would run without problem on low-end hardware.

                • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I have not checked both, but seems like both are insignificant. From what I understand, the messages and files are only stored on the server until reception.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Then keep using it. However, no one else is using in my experience and there so many apps and servers I can’t keep it all straight. Not user friendly at all.

      If you like and have people using it then that’s fine but I wouldn’t start using in 2024. There are much nicer systems.

  • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This speadsheet desperately needs the first column and row anchored, it’s unreadable as is because you can’t see what you’re looking at.

    As far as users go, add the features people are used to from Telegram and other messengers, and make it just as easy to use and it’ll probably start pulling in more people. A big one IMO is good discoverability; like an easy to remember username that I can share, and ability to pull in my contacts and automatically add people who are already on it. As well as good group chat and channel support with good moderation tools.

    Some things would be easy to improve on too, Telegrams sticker packs for example are a bit of a pain to update, so adding that feature but making it better would be nice.

    Also easy sync to other devices without needing to manually backup/restore chats would be a huge plus for any of the alternative messenger apps.

    • umami_wasabi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      From SimpleX creator, it doesn’t scale well with groups >50 ppl, so it is not going to be your Telegram/Facebook/social media replacement.

    • foremanguyOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I wouldn’t use SimpleX for public and large groups, only for small and 1:1, use SimpleX with your friends ans family

    • foremanguyOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I wouldn’t use SimpleX for public and large groups, only for small and 1:1, use SimpleX with your friends ans family

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    SimpleX ftw. I’ve been using it for about six months, but I’ve really started using it much more often recently.

  • dingdongitsabear
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    can you run it on multiple devices and have them all synced? how about chat export in a readable format?

    • foremanguyOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It can run as long as your on the same network as the other instance and for the chat export in readable format, I actually don’t know, sorry

      • rcbrk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        That rules it out for me then. I like to use XMPP+OMEMO with about 4-5 clients which I can continue a conversation with at any time. Main mobile, tablet, desktop, other desktop, and backup mobile which is usually switched off. (Even if a device has been missing for too long and run out of OMEMO keys, the keys sync up again once I send a message with it.)

  • TheDorkfromYork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Jami is good if you cant local network sync. Basically the same as simplex but more steps to make a new account.

  • TheDorkfromYork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Jami is good if you cant local network sync. Basically the same as simplex but more steps to make a new account.