• Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Still better having new universal standards come out over time (as requirements exceed the capabilities of the previous standards) than having a different one for each company or device.

  • Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I have a piece of furniture with a snap in power station and it probably has USB 1.0 ports on it. I don’t care how cool the tech is, if you’re trying to incorporate it into a long lasting product like furniture, it really needs to be a standard module that is easy to upgrade. Mine snaps out but I have no idea if an updated version exists anywhere because there’s no standardization and this furniture company doesn’t show anything on their website.

    • xenoclast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’d prefer non-corporate internationally approved standards over modularity. We were able to do it with CAT/ITU …

  • Michal@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I never used any public ports. Reality is if i have a cable with me, I’m just as likely to have a power bank, and it charges my phone faster. It also gives me more freedom of movement as I don’t have to be wired to a wall.

  • Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I have a piece of furniture with a snap in power station and it probably has USB 1.0 ports on it. I don’t care how cool the tech is, if you’re trying to incorporate it into a long lasting product like furniture, it really needs to be a standard module that is easy to upgrade. Mine snaps out but I have no idea if an updated version exists anywhere because there’s no standardization and this furniture company doesn’t show anything on their website.

  • Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I have a piece of furniture with a snap in power station and it probably has USB 1.0 ports on it. I don’t care how cool the tech is, if you’re trying to incorporate it into a long lasting product like furniture, it really needs to be a standard module that is easy to upgrade. Mine snaps out but I have no idea if an updated version exists anywhere because there’s no standardization and this furniture company doesn’t show anything on their website.

    • clif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I enjoy the A to C converter on the side that you didn’t explicitly call out. Nice easter egg :D

      • Kraven_the_Hunter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Haha. That wasn’t on purpose, I swear! It’s also connected to the even-more-unique C to Micro converter. I actually needed to dig out my USB mini cable the other day.

    • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I was looking to book a hotel recently and one of the hotels listed “Every room equipped with iHome radio dock” as an amenity.

      What year is it?!

    • JordanZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I still rock an old iPod. At a gym I’d imagine it’s more for those than phones at this point.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    128
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s what USB-A to USB-C cables are for. Most of those outlets don’t provide any fast charging anyway.

    • aulin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Wait. I thought they were saying it’s annoying that there are now USB-C outlets replacing USB-A, which would be a waste. They actually want USB-C outlets?! I’d guess at least half of all USB-C cables are USB-A to USB-C. There’s absolutely no reason to switch from A-outlets.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        USB-c are more convenient and have a wider range of uses. We should be moving to that for everything.

        Actually I was disappointed last year …. After reading for so long that Apple was the last remaining holdout for usb-c, I switched my phone and watch, and have been wondering where everyone else is. Why is it still the minority to find USB-C power strips and chargers and power banks and outlets and random devices? In my case, it means I don’t have a clean switch from Lightning to USB-C but now have to buy legacy cables too

        • aulin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          USB-c are more convenient and have a wider range of uses.

          How? Since USB-C has been around for so long, A-C cables have been the norm from the start. Everyone has them already. I don’t see the downside.

          • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            The symmetry and not needing to glance at the end of the plug (or rotate it several times to figure out if it’s rotated wrong or just isn’t aligned properly) is nice.

          • lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            Sure, but recently (the last two years actually sound about right) we have been starting to replace A-C cables with C-C cables and often with fast and small GaN powerbricks that are USB-C out.

            • aulin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              I had to look up what that means. Does it really matter that much? We have fast chargers using A-C cables for phones since far back. Is PD that much better?

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            Those of us who never had to buy them now have to for backward compatibility. That especially includes us iPhone people who are new to the party and have to buy both the newer standard and the older. There are a lot of iPhone people.

            For anyone, you have to carry double the number of cables. You might find a modern charger or you might find an older one.

            Are you asking why USB-C is more convenient? It’s smaller, it’s reversible, it carries more power, it has faster data …. How’s it not more convenient?

            • aulin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Those of us who never had to buy them now have to for backward compatibility. That especially includes us iPhone people who are new to the party and have to buy both the newer standard and the older. There are a lot of iPhone people.

              That’s more of an Apple issue than a USB issue, imo.

              For anyone, you have to carry double the number of cables. You might find a modern charger or you might find an older one.

              I agree that’s annoying. But again, once the transition started, C-C cables came with A-C adapters. Those still exist.

              Are you asking why USB-C is more convenient? It’s smaller, it’s reversible, it carries more power, it has faster data …. How’s it not more convenient?

              The size difference is minimal. If you’re saying you can bring a C-C cable but not an A-C cable, I don’t believe you. Reversible is just a matter of flipping it if it’s wrong. USB-A still has up to 30 W. Do you really need fast charging in public outlets? Data is moot, since we’re talking about charging and ideally even using non-data cables to avoid unintentional data transfer.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        I still run across them that charge at 1.0 speeds. I’m pretty sure if my phone isn’t turned off they can’t actually keep my phone from dying at idle.

      • seaQueue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 days ago

        So you plug an A to C cable into them (or hang an A to C dongle off the end of your usual cable) and charge from them.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Of course they have heard of those cables. They very likely own a few themselves.

      It would be nice to only have to carry a single C-C cable in your bag though.

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s not so much the connector; but the power delivery standard.

      Type A maxes out at 5v 3a = 15w and is often limited closer to 5v 1a = 5w for public-use charging ports.

      Type C and its power delivery standards can get as high as 50v 5a = 250w (though usually closer to 20v 5a = 100w)

      Then again… The negotiation for what voltage/amperage to supply happens over the data lines which you don’t want connected on a public charging port…

      I dont really see a good solution here.

        • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Yes, obviously that’s always been an option.

          I dont see a good solution for the topic we were actually talking about: creating high-power public use charging ports.

          • myplacedk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            Charge the powerbank with the public charger. No data to steal, no expensive phone with sensitive electronics to break.

            • med@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              One day, I’m sure there will be a defcon talk about reprogramming powerbanks to fry devices.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    As an anarchist I’m so glad we also made the word universal useless by making all kinds of different power and data transmit standards that ports and cables may or may not support. As a Satanist I also love that there is no system for labeling anything to know what cable will support what protocol.

  • mholiv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    2 days ago

    Idk. Like all the usb ports were capped at like 5v 1a with shorted data lines. I always used my own charger just because it would take 6 hours to charge my phone using the built in usb plug.

    • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is why next to my couches are multi-port chargers.

      The ones I’m using currently have 8 ports; 2 at 65W, 3 at 30W, and 3 at 20W. The 30 & 60 are USB-C, 20W is USB A. The 65W is plenty for laptops, tablets, and phones. 30W for tablets and phones if the 65W is in use or headphones, eBook reader, etc. 20W for all that miscellaneous simple device charging, anything micro USB, etc.

      Way better strategy than built in IMO. Easy to replace, old one goes somewhere else (or given to family members), etc.

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Takes forever to bring the charge up; but perfect for maintaining battery while you watch/scroll on trips.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Also great to squeak a little battery in if your phone was flat and you needed to make a call.

  • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s why USB ports are always worse than a proper outlet. Just take your charging brick with you, what’s the problem?

      • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Chargers are almost always compatible with any a/c voltage and only need a physical adapter to plug into a wall socket in a different country. Or bring a power bank with you

      • hobovision@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’ve got a brick for EU/UK/USA/AUS plugs with 3 type a and 1 type c and an international multiplug ac/ac pass through.

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m a PD evangelist. Imagine a safer power delivery system that can go directly to the device you want powered. Scale that with fact most of the world could be and should be DC with AC being good just for niche applications like microwaves and mid range transmissions.

      • pishadoot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Tell me you don’t understand how electrical transformers work without telling me you don’t know understand electrical transformers work.

      • mholiv@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        You say most of the word should be DC I till you realize that you need a 3cm thick cable to move 2000w 30m. DC is really bad outside of low or ultra high power transmission.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yeah. This is the problem with trying to enforce standards on industries that historically move at glacier speed, with standards used by tech moving at breakneck speeds.

    The only happy part of USB-C in this context is that, at least right now, the USB-C connector doesn’t seem to be going anywhere anytime soon, so if things get updated to USB C, we should be okay for a while.

    Personally, I carry a whole assortment of USB cables with me everywhere. C-to-C, A-to-C, even A-to-lightning, and A-to-microB. I don’t use an iPhone, nevermind one that needs a lightning cable. And I have moved away from most accessories that require micro.

    I also have a power brick in my pack with the cables, it’s a GaN power brick from Anker, with over 100W of output, two USB-C outputs, and one USB-A. At least one of the type C ports supports enough power output to charge my laptop, the other USB C port for my phone, and the USB A port for anything else that might need it. I don’t recall the exact power capacity of it, but if memory serves, it will take 100-240V, 50-60hz AC input, so at most, I just need to get one of those cheap converters for the receptacle type used wherever I may find myself.

    I work in tech, so being without power is a huge problem. My work laptop also takes USB C for charging, so I don’t need to have two power bricks with me. I usually have both, but I don’t need to have both.

    As long as there’s power available and is sufficiently clean and stable, I’m good. I have a few accessories that are not USB C compliant, some have USB C ports but won’t trigger a proper USB C charger to deliver any power, which is why I have USB A to C cables, and there’s two devices I have that uses a proprietary cable (a Bluetooth headset and my smart watch), which I’ve obtained spares for which I keep one charging cable at home and one in my kit. My kit also includes a USB A/C power bank. It’s not powerful enough to charge my laptop, but it’s fine for everything else.

    USB C has simplified the cables I carry. I still have a few odds and ends for edge cases, but for the most part, I’m okay with it.

    My only big issue with USB C at this point is that it’s not just for power+usb data anymore. It’s thunderbolt, and display port, and… Ugh. So many things using the same connector that I don’t know what will work anymore when I get to a new device, because though it looks like USB C, it might be USB C QC, or PD, or thunderbolt, or display port, or… FML.

  • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    USB-A ports have been outdated since at least 2017, when it started seeing very widespread use. It’s everyone else that’s late

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    rented a car a couple weeks ago. it didn’t have usb-a OR a lighter outlet-- had to go buy usb-c to usb-c cables

    incidentally, if you’re in the market for a new car, don’t buy a mazda cx30. and not even for the usb issue, it just all-around sucks