• ramenu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well, I disagree about Signal. Proton however, I agree is extremely shady and should be avoided at all costs.

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s pretty strong and I’ve never seen or heard anything like it before. If it’s true I’m betting the rest of Lemmy would like some details, too.

      • ramenu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        No support for Monero despite it being requested on uservoice 6 years ago. A Bitcoin wallet (seriously?) which is easily traceable. Important email metadata is also not zero access encrypted (i.e., subject headers, from/to headers) which leaks a substantial amount of information even if the body is encrypted. Not to mention they had clearnet redirects from their onion service a while back, something a lot of honeypots usually do.

        Even if it’s not a honeypot, you’re sure as hell not getting any privacy with Proton. That’s for sure.

        • ScreaminOctopus@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          You can’t e2e the to and from headers in an email. that’s a problem with the protocol, not with proton. I’d assume the subject line falls into a similar bucket, because mailservers probably want to use it to filter spam

          • ramenu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I never said anything about E2EE. Please re-read what I wrote carefully.