It’s not gonna win anything and we shouldn’t act like it will.
Still, no reason not to be correct about it. He’s gonna try and make his delusions national news, so, gotta have the reality out there.
Mind the shavings
It’s not gonna win anything and we shouldn’t act like it will.
Still, no reason not to be correct about it. He’s gonna try and make his delusions national news, so, gotta have the reality out there.
Yeah, people who act like it could never be funny are insufferable and people who actually do it are psychos.
Crying children. It’s gross but it’s also just sad.
Musk and other bad-news big tech dweebs want to end the concept of countries altogether.
If they get good enough AI and drones on their side, they might legitimately be able to take down a major military.
It’s not even selfish. It bites the people who fight for it in a thousand different ways.
It’s just silly. If they were any good at being selfish, they’d want people to have healthcare, because everybody else’s shit makes your world better or worse regardless of your money or whether you acknowledge it.
Suck that strong conservative ladydick, fellas 🇺🇸 🇺🇸
I don’t know about “with any value”. I think he just thinks he’s the only person. And the other people are…something else. Like people, but not.
By a thin margin, yes.
And only because “non-engagement” can’t run.
Americans very much almost didn’t vote him in. Also a fact, and it paints a very different picture.
Taliban has made their country shittier than republicans have made america and god dammit they’re not losing that battle anymore.
You can’t do it and be right, but you can do it and be dumb and wrong.
Change that to take over the Democratic party and you got a good idea.
Kids understand in about two seconds. Effortlessly.
If guns had a function besides murder, that would be a bad argument, but they don’t. Defense is just the threat of murder.
Shooting at the range for fun, I suppose, but if people are actually serious about that they’d want to store their guns there because there’s no need for them anywhere else.
Yeah, Greenland
It’s complicated. Tl;dr: they’re both true.
It’s not any more strange than literally any republican voting to shoot themselves in the foot. Nobody benefits from it. Not even the rich! It just feeds their money addiction like a drug dealer feeds a junkie.
Trump almost has it. If he can just be a slightly bigger ass on a slightly bigger stage, then he’ll be happy.
Musn’t give up too soon.
You have to be especially shitty to side with the guy after it’s all come out.
How am I supposed to have fun if I’m not better than you???
Edit: ???
The patterns of behavior between shareholders, boards of directors, and executives is what’s killing people. The same role can be re-cast with different actors.
It’s not that CEOs need to die, it’s that that larger pattern of behavior that gets rich by killing people needs to end. Maybe this spooks other people who are part of that larger pattern into stopping, maybe it makes them do it more, stealthier, and with bodyguards. It’s hard to say.
At the very least, we should all jump at every chance to help things without hurting anybody, wherever we do find it. “Necessary violence” comes with a big ol heap of plausible deniability, and it’s a pretty big ask for somebody to handle it responsibly.
The justification will be alluring even in circumstances where it is not legitimate.