• hello_hello [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    There are people here who say that GNOME is a copy of MacOS I want to let you know that you that you are deeply unserious, one desktop is functional and the other is MacOS.

    Same thing with people who say KDE is a Windows clone like Windows 11 didn’t just steal KDE design language but made it worse because unlike KDE which is unified, just a few clicks in Windows you are suddenly transported to 2010 with the old Windows control panels, and Windows users vastly prefer the older menus.

    Linux desktops are superior to their proprietary rivals. We may not have Adobe (lmao who needs that shit 🥴), we may not have HDR (not yet, check back in a couple of months or half a year), we don’t have display mirroring (okay that one is valid) but our workflow is far superior.

    • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      GNOME did a lot of innovation and took A LOT of flak for it, but in the end they were right and most of the improvements to Windows Explorer after the disaster of Windows 8 were cribbed directly from it. The fact that you can launch a program on Windows by pressing the Windows key and typing two or three characters followed by enter is all thanks to GNOME. The fact that, after launching that program you can send it to the left half, right half, or full screen by pressing Windows-left, WIndows-right, or Windows-up is all thanks to GNOME. For all the talk in Windows 9x era programming manuals about how not all computers have mouse inputs, GNOME actually nailed down the keyboard-driven interface for “floating” window managers. The fact that you can hold ctrl-shift-left/right and drag these windows between several virtual desktops is just Linux users grave-dancing on Windows with a 10+ year old concept.

    • krakenfury@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      3 months ago

      Workflow on Linux: Whatever I want. Workflow on MacOS: Whatever they want, and if I want to change something, I have to install a third party tool reverse engineered from their private API that will break on every update.

    • krolden
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 months ago

      Gnome did kinda steal its look from osx though. Gnome looked nothing like that when osx was released.

      Windows11 definitely stole a lot from KDE though.

    • Luke
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 months ago

      I can’t see much except the most surface level similarities between GNOME and macOS, anyhow. After finally ditching Windows a couple of years back, I now use GNOME daily, and the transition was very natural. Annoyingly, I (have to) have macOS for occasional work stuff, and current macOS is nothing at all like GNOME except they both have dialog windows and popup menus, I guess? Even those don’t look or work similarly though, so I’m not sure where this idea that they are a copy came from. Maybe from people who haven’t used either one in years?

      How in the hell macOS got a reputation for being intuitive, I do not understand; it is the polar opposite of intuitive. GNOME on the other hand, just works exactly as I would expect. It’s easy, it’s pretty, it’s free, and it doesn’t have any ads. Installing software is simple for non-technical people, and the home key takes you to the front of a line of text as you’d expect. 🤣

      extra rant about macOS

      Just about every time I try to do anything remotely productive in macOS it is massively frustrating and makes me literally angry.

      • The fucking home key doesn’t even work properly, you have to do some weird ass key combination that I can’t remember to get back to the front of a line of text.
      • Sometimes you hit the wrong key combination by accident, or have the audacity to click on the desktop, and suddenly every application you were using flies away.
      • Installing a downloaded application sometimes is just not fucking allowed without messing around under the hood because the app developer didn’t pay Apple’s fee to mark it “safe”.
      • The non-App Store installation process is confusing as shit. You have to click the “installer” disk image in your downloads to mount it, then click on the icon on your desktop (assuming you already knew it was going to show up there), which might then display a weird dialog with two icons just sitting there, and oh yeah you’re supposed to now also drag one of those icons and drop it over the other one, then unmount the disk image from your desktop or else it’s maybe confusing for your grandma when she uses the computer later and wants to run that application, like WTF is this process? Just fucking do the install and get out of the way!
      • If you want to do anything that doesn’t happen to have been blessed by Apple, you probably have to pay some asshole for an app that might maybe provide some hacky way to do it until a macOS update changes how shit works and breaks it.
      • Maybe it’s just me, but mouse clicks and general UI feedback from input on macOS feels incredibly sluggish all the time. I suppose they have subtle animation effects that are causing that, I dunno, but it always feels vaguely like trying to run underwater, and I’ve got one of the supposedly awesome Silicon M2 Mini purchased new within the last year, so I don’t see why it should be anything but snappy.

      Just a constant barrage of basic established UI stuff functioning fundamentally differently for no apparent good reason is so god-damned frustrating in that pile of shit OS. I’m a technical user, so I can eventually figure out how to get done whatever I need to eventually, but holy fuck I don’t know how regular people manage in that usability abomination.

    • TheDoctor [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      We may not have Adobe (lmao who needs that shit 🥴)

      The majority of workers in many media-centric fields, unfortunately. Can’t for Adobe to rest on their laurels for so long that they finally lose some market share.

    • RoabeArt [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve always seen people say that if you are coming from MacOS then try GNOME, and if you are coming from Windows then try KDE. This is the first time I’ve heard of anyone say either of those desktops blatantly ripped their respective OS’s off.

      • hello_hello [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        The two proprietary desktops are so feature-bloated that it’s hard to say exactly what “creative inspiration” was taken but KDE devs have talked about how they noticed Windows likes to copy KDE and even Deepin for their desktop for the “new and improved” ugly bottom bar that Windows users love to tell everyone they hate.

        MacOS and Windows and KDE all use Qt as their toolkit so it’s not hard to see the similarities.

  • gueybana [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Dgaf it’s10x better than Windows,

    you’re trying to desperately hide Windows in the corner, putting up tux to fight. Mac’s not winning that battle, sure, but bring out the red headed stepchild

  • CommunistCuddlefish [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    No, MacOS’s UI is fantastic!

    (Once you install 4 different 3rd party software tools (2 of which require licenses to buy (1 of which is abandoned and doesn’t work smoothly on any officially supported Mac OS)) to fix it)

    Anyway this is a way of saying yes, stock Mac OS UI is very lacking and also asking, what Linux distro should I try if I like a lot of things about MacOS’s UI especially with the trackpad geature control and keyboard shortcuts for window organization and resizing I get from third party applications?

    • AlexWIWA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is such an accurate comment. Mac is antithetical to productivity, out of the box. Managing windows on Mac is so frustrating. Especially if you run a vertical monitor because now the task bar is physically disconnected from the window. I hate it.

      • FuckBigTech347@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Whenever I used macOS I felt very restricted, like as if I had to do real work but all I had in front of me was a toolbox full of plastic toys meant for children. It was NOTHING like GNOME, despite what many like to parrot. Compared to macOS, GNOME on Linux or BSD is SO much better in terms of workflow.

    • FumpyAer [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Any distro that uses GNOME as the desktop environment will have touch screen/trackpad gestures, an app tray, and virtual desktops, as well as a touch screen friendly interface.

      Fedora Workstation uses GNOME by default and I really like the way that distro feels. Their full drive encryption is very easy to set up during install process too, just check the box and come up with a password.

      If you haven’t tried Linux before, make a Live USB and boot from that to check that your hardware works with it. There is no fully stable Apple Silicon Linux distro so it will have to have Intel, AMD, or ARM cpu.

      https://fedoraproject.org/workstation/download

      There is a popular GNOME extension that adds window gestures as well. Video demo and link to get it

      • CommunistCuddlefish [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Cool! Thanks for the suggestion :)

        That’s fine, I don’t have and I’m sure will never get Apple Silicon anyway, the new machines are extremely expensive, deliberately fragile and difficult to repair and maintain, and I hate the direction MacOS is going in (worse UI, genAI – one advantage of not having apple silicon is the ai bullshit doesn’t run on older chips!)

        • FumpyAer [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          If your device has nvidia graphics you will need proprietary drivers, otherwise the kernel should “just work” without any tinkering. So if you have to buy new hardware, avoid an nvidia discrete GPU. But if that’s what you have, you can work around it. Intel and amd integrated graphics work great out of the box.

    • hello_hello [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Fedora Workstation or Silverblue. They come with the latest GNOME desktop environment which is closer to Mac’s design vision minus all appleisms and steve jobs worship. You can easily install extensions using the extension manager flatpak application which adds neat functionality like window tiling and blur.

      If you want complete customization and control you can instead use Fedora KDE/Kinoite which you can customize to look like MacOS or your own custom design. I personally think KDE is generally more powerful and feature-rich than GNOME but GNOME has a simple but unique and intuitive design that doesn’t change and the GNOME devs are legit artisans when it comes to eye candy. GNOME is also the default Linux desktop on a lot of distros which is a plus.

      Silverblue and Kinoite are atomic variants of Fedora that are based around atomic (one-click) updates to the OS image. It eliminates the haphazard-ness of Linux updates but certain things that are basic on non-atomic spins are slightly more involved (like installing additional programs outside of the ones in the image).

  • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Nah, MacOS > Windows for me:

    1. Homebrew > Chocolatey. Yeah, Homebrew doesn’t hold a candle to apt/pacman/dnf, but with Homebrew you can install popular programs used in Linux like btop. With Homebrew, you can turn your terminal into something that mostly resembles a Linux terminal. Meanwhile, you’re stuck with installing Windows programs like Notepad++ with Chocolatey.

    2. MacOS comes with zsh by default, which is useful because zsh is used by other Unix-likes like Linux and BSD. As of Windows 11, the default shell is Powershell. Unless you really like Powershell, having zsh instead of Powershell is a plus if only because it’s also used in other OS.

    3. Spotlight > Windows search. Windows search is trash tier. It’s slow and gives you useless shit instead of what you want. And unless they really botched spotlight post-Catalina, spotlight is honestly better than most Linux DE searches. Not as good as the golden standard for searches: KRunner.

    For everything else, they both suck and require third-party tools to make them suck less. Windows is only better than MacOS if you’re a g*mer.

  • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    yea, never got why anyone would seek out macos. at least with windows you could run shit on it, i can download whatever repacks i want double click install and run.

    windows (and yes, linux) runs on everything no issue everything from $100 mini PCs to 4090 gaming PCs, mac only runs on apple’s hardware (yes there is hackintosh but no one but nerds use that shit). same reason why i do not care about Apple Silicon, its not like I can buy it separately.

  • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    As someone with a MacBook Air M2, the hardwares is top notch, some of the best in the world.

    The software however, is complete garbage.

      • lapis [fae/faer, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I don’t mean to be a total removed, but damn, hardware support is… not great right now. no non-HDMI external display support (so Thunderbolt, USB-C, and DisplayPort displays are a no-go), no Thunderbolt or USB4 support at all (so good luck if you’ve been using a Thunderbolt dock to connect all your peripherals + display(s) via one cable), and the internal display can’t do 120Hz or HDR. it’s cool that it mostly works, but those issues would make Asahi Linux on MBP a non-starter for many professionals – especially since many of us who have been running Macs for a few years are using USB-C or Thunderbolt displays with built-in USB hubs or Thunderbolt docks at this point, or displays that can only run their full resolution and/or framerate via Thunderbolt or DisplayPort and run at lower resolution and/or framerate over HDMI.

        source: https://asahilinux.org/fedora/#device-support

        • Lawn_and_disorder [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Sure but I spotted asahi a year or two ago. At that point not much worked. Things are going forward pretty fast. Im impressed at whats been done so far

          For an end user who uses Just WorksTM distro, Asahi Linux might not be “done” until they are able to boot their favourite distro’s installer off a USB stick and run its install procedure like they would on an amd64 machine. They likely also expect features like 3D acceleration, modesetting, WiFi, Bluetooth, Thunderbolt etc. to all work out of the box. For this to all be the case, all the relevant kernel patches have to be accepted upstream and then pulled into the distro’s generic kernel and the user’s particular machine must have support in U-Boot. Considering that at the time of writing, many of these drivers haven’t even been committed to linux-asahi, so this point is probably quite far away. For people who expect such things, Asahi Linux likely won’t be “done” for another year, maybe two.

          https://github.com/AsahiLinux/docs/wiki/"When-will-Asahi-Linux-be-done%3F"

          • lapis [fae/faer, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I mean, for me personally, I don’t mind having to do a good amount of legwork to get a distro running – that was the case with getting Linux running on most x86 laptops for a long time. but not even being able to get critical functionality working would make Asahi Linux a non-starter for me – I’d prefer to either get a PC laptop and run Linux or an MBP and run MacOS with a load of homebrew packages.

            and don’t get me wrong, it’s really cool that Asahi’s development is moving so fast! but it’s just not at a place where I could run it on a work machine, and I bet that applies to many other professionals, too.

    • neo [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      It ain’t THAT bad. Ever since they normalized on installing into /opt/homebrew/ it got a lot better.

  • umbrella
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    its better than windows. low bar to clear but still.

    • chickentendrils [any, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      Better than 11. I’m a Debian head for decades now, only boot windows for occasional rare Adobe or some game that works better there.

      MacOS is the worst of all worlds, it’s like modern Linux but with some of the obfuscation of the file system out of the box and limitations akin to those imposed in a Windows environment.

  • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ll be honest, I’ll take Mac os 10/10 times over Linux on my actual machine.

    On a server? Linux 10/10 times. But you can’t take my M1 MBP and Mac OS away from me. Nothing comes close to the combo.

    • krakenfury@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      i haven’t taken the time to learn zsh, but i imagine there is an advantage to configuring it for yourself