minus-squareAgreeableLandscapelinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down5·3 years agoThey’ve been predicting it since 2016. This is some doomsday prediction shit. “Wrong? Just push the date back!”
minus-squaremorrowindlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down4·3 years agoThat’s pretty funny. but reports of Russian troops aren’t the same as a prediction of invasion.
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆linkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down2·3 years agoIt’s the obvious implication, otherwise why report the troops at all?
minus-squaremorrowindlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down4·3 years agoMedia sees decent story, they post it.
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆linkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down2·3 years agoWhat’s the story exactly, that Russia has and army and a border with Ukraine?
minus-squaremorrowindlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·3 years agoNo, that there a lot of russian troops near the border
minus-squaremorrowindlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down3·3 years agoThe rest of the year, I would assume. I don’t see why this is so hard to understand.
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆linkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·3 years agoSounds like the stories did their job convincing you that there is some significant build up of troops compared to the rest of the year. You just assume that to be the case without actually knowing.
They’ve been predicting it since 2016.
This is some doomsday prediction shit. “Wrong? Just push the date back!”
That’s pretty funny.
but reports of Russian troops aren’t the same as a prediction of invasion.
It’s the obvious implication, otherwise why report the troops at all?
Media sees decent story, they post it.
What’s the story exactly, that Russia has and army and a border with Ukraine?
No, that there a lot of russian troops near the border
Relative to what?
The rest of the year, I would assume. I don’t see why this is so hard to understand.
Sounds like the stories did their job convincing you that there is some significant build up of troops compared to the rest of the year. You just assume that to be the case without actually knowing.