• Maeve@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Even at loss of limb, those who escape are the 144000, sent to show others the way?

  • Gigan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 months ago

    I think the evolution of multicellular life is most likely to be the great filter, since it took the longest to develop on earth.

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      We tend to focus on distance from it’s star and size to determine a planet’s habitability, but one of the most distinctive things about Earth is that it is essentially a two-planet system with the moon. The ratio of planet size to orbital object is pretty unique. The moon has all kinds of benefits, like tides and deflecting objects from Earth.

      Then there’s the magnetosphere, which Mars doesn’t have and look what happened to it. And Jupiter’s massive size and gravitational influence play a crucial role in protecting Earth from extraterrestrial objects, including comets and asteroids.

      Even with all that the Earth might never have developed intelligent life.

  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t think that’s an “if” at all. I firmly believe that that’s exactly it.

    The same behaviours that we needed to evolve are harmful now that we’ve reached a potential “post-scarcity” stage.

    To put it more bluntly, the drive to compete for resources in order to survive is what made us the dominant species. Now that post-scarcity is essentially upon us, our nature is to create artificial scarcity in order to satiate that drive for competition. And it will be the ultimate end of us.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I like the idea that the Great Filter is really just civilizations turning inward. Like they all get to a point where they realize that space travel is just really not viable and so they stop looking to explore the universe or find other life. Instead they turn to virtual worlds to prolong their existence with what resources they have available in their own star systems. Not even Dyson spheres or anything, they just go into digital hibernation and live out the rest of their lifetimes in a fabricated paradise for however long they can. Maybe they’re able to use drugs/genetics/whatever to slow time down to a crawl where it feels like they live thousands of years within a normal lifespan.

    For Outer Wilds fans, basically:

    spoiler

    Owlks

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Like uploads? If so, couldn’t they have all this fun while slowly traveling the universe?

      “We’re sorry to interrupt everyone’s simulation, but we’re happy to remind you that you’re a person on a spaceship and we just found something interesting!”

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Then we would start ‘behavorial sink’ and slowly decline in population. Someone else mentioned Calhoun and his rat utopia the other day and I looked it up. It seems like we are going through our version of behavioral sink.

  • sbr32@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t know if this theory has a proper name but I have seen it multiple times.

    If a species has the ability to push their technology to the point they could become a space faring species, that technology will destroy the civilization before it can get there

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      It may depend on the rate they get to that point. Add in a dense energy source that’s suddenly available and the rise of tech may be lethal. Perhaps the lucky ones don’t have something like petroleum so their species matures long before they ruin their world.

      • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Back up…dude with a 10th grade level understanding of biology and chemistry coming through with a question…

        So carbon-based life forms can, under the right circumstances, decompose into long chains of hydrocarbons like Petroleum.

        Does that mean silicon-based life forms under the right circumstances would break down into hydrosilicates like caulk?

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I don’t know about the end result under the same extremes. I do know that silicon life, while not impossible, it’s probably unlikely. Silicon does parallel carbon in some ways including a similar location on the periodic chart (which is why it got attention from scifi writers), but the issue is simply silicon is nowhere near as “greedy” as carbon bonds.

          But it is a big universe.

  • Grayox
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Reminds me of my thoughts after reading “Why Buddhism is True” by Robert Wright. If you haven’t read it before I highly recommend it.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Think of Star Trek as an analogy.

      • The Archers, Pikes, Kirks succeeded by being bold and daring, confronting dangers, fighting to survive. The Siskos and Burnhams instigated war on a galactic scale. They were violent, reactive, risk takers
      • a couple centuries later, the Picards confronted greater obstacles but with reason, compassion, self-sacrifice. If Kirk had faced Q, that would have been the great filter, but Picard succeeded as a human evolved past his violent reactions
      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’ve never watched Star Trek.

        I know, heresy for lemmy.

        I also use windows and not linux (though I plan on switching when I get time to learn linux)

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Wow, it’s like talking to an Alien …… while I do occasionally use Windows, my main laptop is OSX, my home servers are Raspian and Suse and at work I use Red Hat, Debian and whatever Amazon Linux is, and my media consumption is Linux or iOS

  • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    I mean there are multiple proposed filters.

    Suppose yours is correct. What is this humanity’s nature you speak of?

    Bravery? Foolishness? Wisdom? Violence? Greed?

    What what of those attributes haven’t we already overcome time and again?

    It’s much more probable that everyone out there is attentively listening to signals instead of radically changing their own mental processes. Or not