Take Firefox’s 1542044, where the dark mode theme colors aren’t exposed when they should. The patch has been up for 4 years.

Or, take this, which is part of a series that added Doxygen parsing to clangd, a language server. It was left unreviewed until late 2022, the patcher went in conversation with the reviewer, but then met radio silence again, long enough to the point where the patch-reviewing service shut down. Clangd currently has only 44 open PRs to review, though it uses the same issue tracker as llvm for some reason.

Aren’t we paying them to do all this?

    • Ephera
      9·
      9 months ago

      I don’t know, if there’s a more general resource, but in the case of Firefox, the donations are so far away from covering the development costs, that they’re not even being used for that. Rather, they earn money from search engine deals and are trying to diversify with Pocket, ads, MDN- and VPN-related services etc…

      In the case of LLVM, I don’t see how they would get many donations to begin with. Maybe Mozilla chips them some of that leftover donation money (they have been doing that with various smaller OSS projects), but I can’t imagine much else.
      LLVM is probably largely being kept alive by companies or programming language orgs scratching their own itches.

        • Ephera
          9·
          9 months ago

          That’s 250 million for development. That chart is also in thousands.

          And this is somewhat beside the point, but Lunduke is a conspiracy nut job and rather looking for an egregious story than the truth. Whatever he interprets into these numbers, you should double check it.

    • davelAEnglish
      2·
      9 months ago

      This is a good question. I learned it the slow, hard way, back when Apache was “a patchy server”. Maybe someone can suggest books or online resources for getting up to speed quicker.