• onlooker
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Agreed. It should say “costs”.

    I’ll show myself out now.

    • WingedSeven
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      it seems like it happens enough to be an acceptable alternate way of saying the cost of something; I see it a lot, including (in fact mostly) by native speakers

      • Demonen
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Languages evolve, or we’d all still be grunting the first sounds. “No, the other other rock. Damn, we should come up with more names for things!”

        • WingedSeven
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          judging by the votes, people seem to think we’re in disagreement, whereas i think you’re spot-on.

          • Demonen
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            This is the internet, people are not supposed to just agree on things. That would automatically be “echo chamber”, and bad. Consensus is specifically disallowed.

            XD

      • BrewJajaja
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        In my experience/opinion, native English speakers have a different set of grammatical errors compared to non-natives. Obviously there is an overlap.

  • Jay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 years ago

    The worst part is the silly over priced fridges you buy probably won’t even last 10 years anymore. Sure they’re more efficient, but if you have to replace it every 10-15 years, is it really worth it? I’d sooner have a slightly less efficient fridge that I know will last than one that can show me ads and look fancy.

    • s_s@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      “More efficient”

      • has french doors,
      • has water dispenser,
      • has two seperate frozen zones (ice and freezer)
      • has main freezer on bottom

      No way this thing is anywhere near efficent.

        • TurretCorruption@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Having the main freezer on the bottom is insanely inefficient. Hot air rises, and cold air falls. When a freezer is on the top, all of the cold air is generated in that freezer, and then it falls through a channel into the main refrigeration area. It keeps both compartments cold using just one system.

          Freezer on the bottom requires either a separate cooling system for the main fridge, or a series of fans that constantly draw cold air upwards, wasting electricity in the process.

    • 3nt3r@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      Appliances these days are absolute junk. Nothing last more then like 7-10 years. My parents have a stainless steel kitchen aid fridge thats 20+ years old and works like a charm and a second shitty white fridge thats at least 15 years old by now. My aunt has gone through 2 samsung fridges in 10 years though

      • Jay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        Ya I just went through all that bullshit last year. my old fridge (maybe 15yrs) crapped out and the repair guy told me flat out that they typically don’t repair stuff like that anymore. Manufacturers make it intentionally difficult to obtain parts and even if you can get them, chances are they’ll crap out before too long. I ended up getting a new Danby. I hope it proves me wrong but…

      • DivineDingus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        We had a KitchenAid fridge crap out and tried or damnedest to get it repaired. In the end, the repair tech said we could throw $1000 worth of parts at it and hope, or get a new fridge. This was our first matching set of appliances and my wife was not going back to slumming with an unmatched kitchen. Guess who had to spend 4K on a new fridge. We didn’t even get a touchscreen. I don’t expect this one to last either.

        • BrewJajaja
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          slumming with an unmatched kitchen

          Oof, very pedestrian logic (her, not you). Time to stop watching HGTV shows. She wasn’t aware that you could panel any fridge to match your cabinet doors?

          I admire your steadfast… patience.

        • 3nt3r@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          Sad thing is its not only refrigerators. Dishwashers, washers, and driers are all junk as well. My parents have had 2 dryers in the last 8 years and my aunt 3 in the last 10 with one of them being repaired like 10 times in 3 years because something was always breaking. Not sure if our family just has horrible luck with those things or if they really are just that crappy now

          • ccunix
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Our dishwasher recently died 2 months out of warranty. Repair cost was basically even with buying a new device of similar quality (on paper).

            Decided to repair because we have had a couple supposedly good dishwashers that were complete junk. At least this one I know actually washes dishes (not given for a modern dishwasher).

    • clonedhuman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Meanwhile, my grandmother had a fridge from the 1960s that still worked fine when she replaced it in 2013.

    • relevant_user_name
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Granted, this is just an anecdote, but I have several Samsung appliances; oven/stove, dishwasher, microwave, televisions, smart phone(okay, I guess those are technically an electronic), and I haven’t had any issues with them. They’ve served me well, even if I haven’t been the kindest to them.

      I guess the point I’m trying to make is “your mileage may vary.”

      • Petri
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        I got one Samsung TV for free for one reason or another – it never really worked properly because all its spyware shit kept tripping up on my custom DNS server.

          • rolaulten@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            There is no good reason to connect any tv to the internet. External devices, those can be connected. But to me the tv is just a big dumb screen.

            • Pankkake@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              I disagree; I find it useful to have apps like YouTube on my TV, it’s handy not having to plug in another device to watch content.

    • chickenwing
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      This. I worked in appliance sales for years and we constantly had issues with Samsung. Their ice makers are complete garbage.

    • Petri
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      And LG - they are both hot garbage.

      • ccunix
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Their TVs are great, had 1 for more than 10 years and a second going on 6 and we’re really happy both.

        Can’t speak for anything else though.

        • Petri
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          True - their TV and monitors are good - I was talking specifically about their washing/drying/fridge.

        • Resonosity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’ve had terrible experiences with LG TVs. Parents owned an old and a newer model, both 65" I think. The OS was so fing slow, I couldn’t really browse through different apps smoothly and seemlessly. Couple this with how the older LG has issues with WiFi where you’d log in in the settings, confirm that the connection has been made, but then once you exited settings it was like if the connection wasn’t ever made in the first place.

          I’ve had suuuch a better time with Roku TVs than LGs, I’ve owned 2 Rokus in my life. OS is smooth, apps are intuitive, no issues with connections. The idle screen is nice too.

          No experience with Samsung TVs tho. Would be nice to see how an OLED looks, but my 4k Roku is fine for now

  • strayce@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Because people keep their fridges too long. They need to be able to remote brick them when they want you to buy a new one.

    • Petri
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      They don’t even do anything - simple is better.

      • NateNate60
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s like that IQ meme:

        • 70 IQ: zero smart home devices
        • 100 IQ: smart fridge, smart watch, smart TV, smart light, smart toilet, smart potted plant…
        • 130 IQ: zero smart home devices
  • laxe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    If you actually want a smart fridge then be aware that when the display breaks, they will charge you the price of a new fridge to replace it.

    I would consider the broken display to be a feature tho.

  • SpooneyOdin
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yikes! And $4000 is the sale price. It’s $4800 regularly…

    • MrAegis
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      That “white board” on the fridge is an “app” that comes with it as a feature. Someone just used it to draw the surprised Pikachu face.
      It’s turned on, but you’re most likely right that it’s not cool because I bet they have the temperature dialed up all the way.

  • micballin
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    4700 before the sale? I wonder why they are having a hard time moving them… /s

  • sina
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think the idea of a smart fridge is not necessarily a bad one. However charging $3600 extra for a screen and a couple of cameras is ridiculous.