• onlooker
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Agreed. It should say “costs”.

    I’ll show myself out now.

    • WingedSeven
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      it seems like it happens enough to be an acceptable alternate way of saying the cost of something; I see it a lot, including (in fact mostly) by native speakers

      • Demonen
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Languages evolve, or we’d all still be grunting the first sounds. “No, the other other rock. Damn, we should come up with more names for things!”

        • WingedSeven
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          judging by the votes, people seem to think we’re in disagreement, whereas i think you’re spot-on.

          • Demonen
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            This is the internet, people are not supposed to just agree on things. That would automatically be “echo chamber”, and bad. Consensus is specifically disallowed.

            XD

      • BrewJajaja
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        In my experience/opinion, native English speakers have a different set of grammatical errors compared to non-natives. Obviously there is an overlap.