• NegativeLookBehind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    233
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    In the past few elections, voting feels more like a hostage situation than exercising my right to making a “choice”. This country is absolutely fucked if Trump is elected again.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yes. That’s the end game of our type of voting system. You get two options and both suck.

      We will get no progress until we get something like ranked choice voting.

        • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          9 months ago

          If we can at least get 2 dems in a row in office we can begin to claw the Overton window back from the fascist side. It’d be a start at least

          • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            26
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            This is the part too may people fail to understand. The same reason Trump wasn’t able to completely dismantle democracy in 4 years is why Dems can’t check every progressive box in 4 years. The system is designed to require a decade or more of electoral success to enact real change. Otherwise you’d just have an unsustainable political yoyo.

            Even then, Trump winning one time has completely fucked the Supreme Court, and US democracy will unequivocally not survive another Trump pick. A ton of allegedly left leaning people here seem suspiciously enthusiastic about that prospect.

          • Cowbee [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            That’s far too naive. All that will do is entrench liberalism, which is extremely weak against fascism rising.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Easier said than done I know but if Trump wins my wife and I would strongly consider emigrating to another country. There’s only so much insanity one can take before needlessly going down with the ship. And if the calculus is that that my kids will have better prospects elsewhere, then so be it.

      • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Fascism is on the rise globally. If enough decent people leave the US, we will fall into a fascist regime, and it will be the beginning of World War Three, with the US leading the equivalent of the Axis powers. No place in the world will be safe for you or your children. That’s the hard, honest truth.

        • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          9 months ago

          Agreed. We need to stay, and we need to fight to change the system from the inside. We can still prevent disaster at this stage.

        • Kaity@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          With my partner, friends, and I being “degenerates” and likely the first group the fascists genocide… nope, see ya, I’m out. We already are experiencing the low-tide effects of genocide and while people aren’t in droves killing us yet, there are state allowed murders seemingly popping up and medical genocides creeping into the states. It’s only a matter of time and there is effectively nothing I can do, so for the lives of my family, friends, and I, we will be doing whatever it takes to get out before it really starts.

          • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            You must do what you feel is right, of course. I disagree that it is inevitable, I disagree that there is nothing you can do, and as I said above, I doubt that, should it happen, anybody will be safe, anywhere; but I wish you and yours safety and peace, wherever you go.

      • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        The problem is that without good people to stop them, evil people taking charge of the USA would radically change the entire world.

        It’s not easy, but most of us have to stay. Maybe all of us…

    • Bamboodpanda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 months ago

      It always has been.

      We might be tempted to think that our Democratic heritage automatically protects us from such threats. This is a misguided reflex. In fact, the precedent set by the founders demand that we examine history to understand the deep sources of tyranny and consider the proper responses to it. - On Tyranny by Timothy Snyder (Chapter 1, Page 13)

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      I wonder if Haley is staying in the race betting that Trump won’t be able to run in November

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      We need to focus on smaller winnable races. Unfortunately we can’t shortcut our way into the presidential candidates we want, we need to replace the establishment and build a foundation of allies to support it. I know a lot of us are in conservative areas where you can’t realistically get new candidates elected locally, but you can still volunteer for races in other parts of the country. If we can shift politics in the house and Senate the presidency will follow. It’s hard work but it’s possible.

  • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Don’t forget, Sanders is the only person Trump has ever admitted he’s afraid of.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      88
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Dems really underestimate what life is like for normal Americans. trump doesn’t get it either obviously, but at least he acknowledges shit is bad for them.

      If Biden tries to run in the economy it’s going to hurt him because all the money is going to the wealthy.

      Bernie acknowledges and actually has a plan to fix shit. And unlike trump points the finger at whose fault it is.

      trump can’t compete with that.

      But neoliberals don’t want to really address wealth inequality either.

        • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          74
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          9 months ago

          Biden is the only thing standing between democracy and fascism in the US. Hate it all you want,but that is the reality at the moment.

          • Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            He can play two roles, it’s not as simple as either good or bad. Capitalist Democratic leadership that is dedicated more to controlling the party’s left wing than defeating the country’s extremist right wing has and does enable fascism. This isn’t even a remotely controversial take, historically speaking. Trump owes his first presidency to the likes of Clinton and Obama, and yes, Joe Biden, who had had a long career of neoliberalism.

            That said, while Biden hasn’t been, by any means, a perfect president, he has been far better than I expected, possibly the most progressive president since LBJ. And he is standing, albeit somewhat vaguely, between Trump and the Whitehouse.

            But stopping Trump isn’t going to stop the slide into fascism. It can only, at best, delay things until the next election. To do that, we need a strong progressive movement to send a true leftist coalition to take over DC, and set a national tone and direction that moves away from the fascist ledge.

            • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              9 months ago

              I think the irony is that Republicans are both as dangerous and fragile as possible right now. Their coalition is fracturing badly. If we win definitively in November, it will be a strong blow against them. If we’re lucky, it’ll be enough to permanently splinter them and make them unviable nationally.

              That is my first and foremost goal. Render them impotent.

            • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              I’m usually all about finding a middle ground, but in this election it is that simple. Trump brings fascism now. Biden retains democracy for at least another 4 years.

            • SupahRevs@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              But Biden has not stayed on the neo-liberal hard line globalist policies. He has recoiled from international supply chains by bringing investment to manufacturing in the US. He has relieved debt payments for college educated workers. He has invested in infrastructure for transportation of goods as well as electricity which tackles the problem of emissions as well as cost of energy. I believe these moves are a reaction to understanding that life is hard and globalism left a lot of people behind.

              • Tinidril@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Me either, and it’s a real shame. The far right would go into beautiful seizures, but he would get massive turnout from pretty much everyone else.

                He’s a far cry from being as far left as I would like, but I really wouldn’t care. He would be more capable of actually fixing things than anyone else I can think of, even Bernie. Can you imagine the hell most of Congress would face to oppose him on pretty much anything?

          • chakan2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            37
            ·
            9 months ago

            Biden isn’t standing between anything…he’s a speed bump. We still lost our reproductive rights, Trump’s tax cuts are still in place, we are still sending money to Israel and not the Ukraine.

            Biden sucks. Don’t vote for Trump…but god it’s fucking depressing that the only alternative is a guy with Alzheimer’s and a meme army for political clout.

            • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              19
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              9 months ago

              We lost our reproductive rights because of judges Trump installed. Biden has no power to change that. Trump’s tax cuts were passed by Congress and can only be undone by Congress, not Biden. Your criticism of Biden’s actions regarding Israel is justified, but let’s not pretend Trump wouldn’t be much worse. Yeah, Biden is old but he is more coherent and aware now than Trump was 20 years ago.

              I wasn’t enthusiastic about Biden last election, but he has easily been the most effective president of my lifetime. He got us out of COVID without the economy crashing. He put hundreds of millions into mental health counselors for schools. He massively accelerated our shift to renewable energy. He has put major efforts into domestic microchip production. He put limits on insulin costs. He got a national electric vehicle charging network funded. He got funding passed for infrastructure improvements including bridges, tunnels, and broadband expansion. He has increased our defenses against cyber attacks and extended political channels for addressing them around the world. He has created more than 800,000 new jobs and gotten 6 million more people healthcare coverage. He passed legislation creating a 15% minimum tax rate on billion dollar corporations.

              https://navigatorresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/October-24-Few-Have-Heard-1280x720.jpg

            • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              The difference is one has caved to public pressure and kept many promises. The other creates negative public-cult sentiment and keeps no promises.

              Yes, it’s frustrating only having these choices right now. However, it is important to point out that we still have choices. People with sentiment just like yours, with a footnote that says “Not gonna vote, because [insert reason here].” are a part of the problem, when they could become a part of the start of a solution. One years, and probably a couple election cycles long, yet still potentially a positive way forward.

            • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              9 months ago

              You lost your reproductive rights because a bunch of Sanders bros decided they’d rather let Trump win than vote for Hillary.

                • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  I mean I still literally see tons of people on the internet who are salty about it and openly use 2016 as an excuse to not vote for Democrats. Granted, a portion of these people were trolls then and are trolls now, but the sentiment is too common to dismiss.

                  And whether or not it is true, it should still be a cautionary tale in pragmatism. I personally voted (and volunteered) for Bernie, but then fought for Clinton because it was plainly obvious what was on the line. I just wish more people had fought for Roe, if not for Clinton at that time, instead of waiting for the obvious outcome to get engaged. And it makes me see red to think that we are about to walk right into the exact same, easily preventable trap

              • chakan2@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Am I the only one that remembers the DNC was sued over that…and Sanders won?

                • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Over what exactly? The only lawsuit the Sanders campaign filed was over a misunderstanding over how a DNC voter database was configured. Both candidates had access to the same modeling and turnout software, and the Sanders campaign was mistakenly able to access data and models Clinton had generated because the system was not configured correctly. He sued when that mistake was corrected, but quickly dropped the suit when the issue was clarified.

                  The lawsuit against Wasserman-Shultz was from a voter group, and it was dismissed. Maybe I’m missing one though. Can you jog my memory?

        • Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          You’re missing a crucial part of that process I think. Milquetoast candidates can cause voter apathy, yes. It’s the apathy that helps fascism.

          • HardNut@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            9 months ago

            Please stop being so dramatic, you shouldn’t be afraid to talk to other people about their political opinions.

            • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              It’s not fear, it’s that no one wants to read the same half assed logic that boils down to actively supporting efforts of conservatives to put Trump back in power. This shit strategy is getting old.

              The winner of the 2024 general election for POTUS will be Donald Trump or Joe Biden. In a FPTP system any eligible vote not cast for Joe Biden is supporting Donald Trump, a member of the minority party. This is math. You are going to support one of these candidates if you’re eligible to vote. It is mathematically impossible to sit out and not have influence.

              Not a single one of the commenters trying to depress Democratic votes has provided a single alternative argument to these facts. It’s not a real argument. It’s just trying to create apathy so conservatives can gain more power.

              You can talk about Democratic principles all day long, voting is a strategic play. And if you were actually trying to defend Democratic principles you would take the action that results in the least harm, which is Joe Biden, not Donald Trump.

              • HardNut@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                9 months ago

                You are discussing strategy to avoid the most harm. Harm avoidance. That’s fear. You are literally describing fear without using the word fear and acting like I was the one misunderstanding. You need to understand that you are acting on fear. It’s ridiculous, and I was right to point it out.

                You mentioned my other comment in passing like it meant nothing to you, then say that no one hear has given any real arguments? Maybe you just need to read in better faith. You clearly don’t have any respect for my concerns with Biden if your comment demonstrates a complete unwillingness to even entertain the thought.

                Canadian btw, you don’t need to convince of anything to do with voting strategy anyway. Wasted energy. I just think you guys are being really silly and can’t see the forest from the trees. You could probably use third party observers to get your heads on straight.

                • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Zero interest in trying to convince you of anything. I just want everyone else to understand that listening to you acts against their own interests. Either you don’t understand how our electoral system works, or you’re misleading people to try and put your thumb on the scale in support of some pretty horrible people.

                  Waiting anytime for an explanation of how Trump getting elected benefits the situation in Gaza btw. Or do we not care about that now because that would be acting out of fear?

            • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              I was being rhetorical. Please stop reading everything people say as black and white ones and zeros.

              • HardNut@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                I know you were being rhetorical. Your rhetoric is pathetic. Please stop assuming people have misunderstood just because they don’t like what you say.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      Take with a grain of salt, considering Putin says Biden is better for him than Trump. While I don’t necessarily agree with the argument, Republicans (and centrist dems) certainly believe Sanders would’ve been an easy target for smear campaigns.

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Trump was an easy target for smear campaigns. That’s why Hillary’s campaign helped Trump win the primary, and that sure worked out well.

        Americans don’t give two shits about what the neolibs think are devastating attacks. They are fed up with the out-of-touch wealthy and political classes.

  • electric_nan
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    Is there a real plan to shore up our “democracy” if the Democrats win this election? What is Biden going to do next term that he didn’t do this term?

    I feel like people are so fixated on Trump that they can’t see past him. Trump is a giant, clown-shaped piece of shit-- absolutely. How does the opposing party fail at politics so hard that someone like Trump ever even had a shot?

      • Scientician@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        But what can you really do? Not voting is beneficial to the open christo fascists, and the only person who has any real world shot at winning an election, for some mind melting reason Joe Biden. The same Joe Biden, who despite his kinda actually not terrible first term, is currently funding a genocide as the wold watches. It’s a shit choice, but this problem isnt going to be fixed this cycle. It’s like punching the clock.

        • Numberone@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Biden isn’t the only one who could win, and seems to be worse off than a generic dem in swing States, by a long shot. They’re choosing the candidate again, like they did with Hillary, from the ranks of the least popular people in the US. They’re shooting themselves and blaming the left and Muslims in MI already.

          • Scientician@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I agree with you completely. I think the DNC is going to do what they want, and it will take time and deliberate action to change them. This cycle is going to be a Trump/Biden election. I don’t see a way around it. Here’s to 2026 and 2028 for making progress with elections. In the meantime we still have to donate and support with our time.

            I’ll be volunteering for Biden, because that’s the best cause I believe I can support during this election. Doesn’t mean I’m super pumped on him being the candidate.

        • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          But what can you really do?

          Not give into cynicism and participate in the democratic process? Democracy isn’t something that you can set and forget, it requires constant attention and participation or it breaks. We are where we’re at because the GOP and big corporations have been carefully engineering widespread burnout in a large percentage of the working class population.

          • Scientician@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Oh for sure. I’m just saying the DNC is going to put up Biden, no matter what, so that’s our choice this round. Action can be taken for 2028, but be real… They’re not going to change horses.

      • electric_nan
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        OK? What if Biden wins, is my question. Is the Democrat value-proposition nothing more than “periodic intervals of slightly slower slide into total fascism”?

          • electric_nan
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            Fuck man, I’ve got a lot I guess. Like the kind of shit the Repubs do, but the Dems claim powerlessness to do. Trump has shown that the rule of law only matters if there is some consequence to breaking it. So break the law. Wield the power. Especially if you genuinely feel like this will be the last ever election. Fucking declare an emergency, arrest Trump and everyone else involved in J6. Send the military to reassert power over the national border in Texas. Break up media monopolies, and nationalize telecoms. Why the fuck would you risk losing an election to a criminal gang who want to end democracy?

            • Tinidril@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              All those possibilities pretty much went out the window when the Democrats nominated Biden. Even if Biden was as left as we would like him to be, he is a technocrat who sees the norms as vital to maintaining the legitimacy of government.

              I don’t even necessarily disagree that maintaining legitimacy is vital, but I’d put representing the people over donors a notch higher than maintaining norms.

              • electric_nan
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                I don’t actually think they were ever possibilities. Even if Bernie had won, his own party would have trampled over the repubs in order to impeach him first lol.

                • Tinidril@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I don’t think so. The more people actually hear Bernie speak, the more they like him. He wouldn’t be hiding from the public like Biden, he would be leading rallies on the Whitehouse lawn. If Bernie had access to the bully pulpit, impeaching him would be political suicide.

            • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Your suggestions are very tempting, I must say. We don’t want to sleepwalk into fascism. It could be 1930s Germany all over again.

              Trump and many of his gang were arrested already, though, and are facing trial. So far, the verdicts have shown that the justice system is still somewhat functional. I don’t think it makes sense to flip the table as long as the justice system continues to hold Trump and his ilk accountable. Taking it to the next level and declaring an emergency would accomplish what, exactly? He has already been charged, so would the point of the emergency declaration be to skip the trial phase and go straight to hanging? Essentially it means outlawing Trumpism, which means purging the GOP, which means civil war. No one wants civil war as long as there is a chance to beat Trump constitutionally.

              We had a situation in Canada in the 90s where our second largest province had a very serious vote on whether to separate from Canada. It would have literally ended the country as we know it. It was certainly tempting to arrest the leaders for treason to save the country. However, that would certainly have led to either a civil war or the Quebecois equivalent of the IRA in Canada. So, we persevered through the vote and the remainers won by about 1%, as I recall. We saved the country by the skin of our teeth, but through legitimate democratic means, and so the result was respected.

              • electric_nan
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Yeah, purge them. As absolutely awful as a civil war would be, I say that it is preferable to risk it now than cordially handing over the reins of power to these clowns from hell. For one, civil war is by no means guaranteed. For all our big talk, most Americans will go along with ‘the program’, whether it’s purges of fascists or purges of minorities. I’m afraid we have to choose one, and I much prefer the former.

            • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              Ελληνικά
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              The supreme Court is slow-rolling determining whether or not a president is liable for criminal activity in office until after the election. If they determine now, then either trump gets held accountable, or Biden has immunity from crimes in office, and can plainly jail or order a hit on trump and a good chunk of Congress.

              Obviously though, the president is not immune from the consequences of crimes committed while in the office.

              • electric_nan
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                9 months ago

                I just don’t understand how you can believe that the supreme court can’t or won’t just ignore precedent.

                • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  Ελληνικά
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  A this point, I think Judge Judy has more integrity than the SC. They are gonna do what they were put there to do, give cover for republicans to undermine human rights.

        • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          In what way have the Democrats advocated for sliding into fascism? They’re status quo politicians, not wannabe dictators like some other orange person.

          • electric_nan
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Intervals of “status quo” between fascist administrations is slow-walking into full fascism.

          • electric_nan
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Fix it how? Like what’s the plan? Is there a plan?

            • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Democracy cannot be permanently “fixed”, it can only be preserved via endless education and participation.

              Literally the only way to “fix” democracy is to participate in it.

              • electric_nan
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                OK? How does that happen? Is there a Dem plan to drive democratic engagement, because they obviously haven’t done a good job of it yet. It seems like fear of Repubs is the main selling point to voting Dem, and it isn’t exactly a thrilling strategy.

                • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  More people voted for Biden in the 2020 election than any other candidate in American history by a pretty significant margin, voter turnout in both midterms and general elections are at their highest points in 100 years, obviously something is working

                • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  How does that happen?

                  It happens when I go canvas and vote, not complain about it on the internet like you.

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            No there is a lesser chance. The worse the conditions get for the more support fascism gets.

            If Trump does not win this election, an even worse person will win the next one

            • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              This, so much, this, I feel like I’m taking crazy pills.

              The Democrats are ideologically incapable of dealing with fascism, they will not address the root causes, America will have an authoritarian in office within 8 years.

              Quite frankly if America can’t withstand trump’s decrepit, corrupt, senile version of fascism then we’re just going to fall to what ever ghoul the Republicans summon next.

    • Tinidril@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I agree that it’s frustrating that Democrats use shitty Republicans as an excuse to be just a tiny bit less shitty. However, it’s getting really annoying that you can’t criticize Trump without someone chiming in with “whadabout Biden?!” and you can’t criticize Biden without getting a “whadabout Trump?!”

      • electric_nan
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        They’re both fucking awful. It’s a waste of time criticizing Trump because everybody knows who he is, and the people that like him don’t give a fuck what he does. They aren’t listening to your criticism. I’m don’t think Dem leadership really wants to actually help working class people, but they definitely don’t have much reason to start when people keep voting for the most “conservative” ones out of fear from the monsters which have mysteriously found a way to represent the other half of voters.

        • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          As far as Democrats go, Biden is amazing. He’s supported Israel no more than Obama or Clinton did. He’s forgiven tens of billions in oppressive student loans. He enacted a funding bill that will finally establish a HSR network in parts of America. He rolled back disastrous Trump era policies on immigration. He fixed Trump’s disastrous COVID response. He re-established relations among NATO countries and was paramount in alerting the world that Russia was about to invade Ukraine when we all knew Trump was trying to weaken their military with his quid pro quo scheme.

          In your opinion, how has Biden failed America?

          • SupahRevs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            To add to this. Biden has passed significant investments in growing manufacturing jobs in the US the results we won’t really see for years. Planting a tree that he will never enjoy the shade of. He has approved renewable energy projects and initiated much needed improvements to energy transmission so more renewable energy can be in the grid when they are built. Biden has done a lot to advance our infrastructure.

          • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Obama didn’t even openly support gay marriage. I get that as the first black president he didn’t want to give the GOP anything to call “radical”, but Biden is doing so much progressives have been asking for in the past 30 years, it’s very hard for me to not be excited by that.

    • lorty
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      You know they don’t . Their strategy was, is, and will continue to be: “The other side is worse”.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Just ask about DC statehood and the Dems’ inability to enfranchise over a million US citizens.

      As soon as you scratch this problem, you discover how shallow and unserious the party is in “protecting democracy”.

      • electric_nan
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        I agree, I’m just trying to get others to see how little “resistance” the Dems pose to the more naked fascism of the Repubs.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think the case of DC Statehood is an obvious example. Whether we’re talking about Kennedy, Clinton, or Obama, we’re talking about a party that’s deliberately disenfranchised over a million people on their watch.

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      The more he loses the less likely he’ll be to win, plus he’s old as hell and not aging gracefully. Rebuking Trumpism is shoring up democracy.

      • electric_nan
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Didn’t we rebuke Trumpism last election? I’m asking why the fuck is Trumpism alternating as the most popular political position for the American electorate. This is an indictment of the political acumen of the Democratic party.

        • Furedadmins@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          We did but facism will never go away. Before they slunk away but now fascists can connect with each other online. Instead of it being a few people that happen to meet up and connect now they can seek each other out. It’s the same reason that racism has made such a dramatic resurgence. It will literally require eternal vigilance.

          • electric_nan
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Is this how it is in all countries? An eternal choice between “whole fascism” and “skim fascism”?

            • Furedadmins@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              It’s further ahead in the US but coming elsewhere. Even in parliamentary countries fascism is coming back although since they are not first past the post not as pronounced. As long as the internet is around and there’s no repurcissions for belonging to those groups they will be around.

              • electric_nan
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                I am aware. It’s a failure of liberal democracy that fascists are allowed any political quarter.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t think there really can be a plan. Like what would you want Biden to do to shore up democracy?

      One of the inescapable, fundamental, bedrock concepts of democracy is that people will not vote for a corrupt, criminal, authoritarian, self serving demagogue.

      If a society can’t achieve that basic state then they can not be a democracy.

      Honestly, I suspect that the best thing Biden can do is to “grey rock” the American people and hope that Trump self combusts, which seems to be what’s happening.

      That said, that’s just the best Biden can do. The dems need an actual leader that can inspire the american people to see a better version of themselves.

      • electric_nan
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Did you mean to have the word “not” in your second paragraph? Because people absolutely vote for leaders like that all the time lol.

        Oh I think I see. I agree that we’re not a real democracy.

    • AfricanExpansionist
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Because Trump is great for me fundraising and keeping party bigwigs at the trough

    • Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sometimes in life there is such a thing that is called: “Maybe there is no Good Vs. Bad just assholes all around”. Good luck with that

    • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      Man, it’s crazy how similar that sounds to exactly what Biden has been saying all along:

      And I’ve said many times before: I believe we’re at an inflection point in this country — one of those moments where the decisions we’re about to make can change — literally change the trajectory of our nation for years and possibly decades to come.

      Each inflection point in this nation’s history represents a fundamental choice. I believe that America, at this moment, is facing such a choice. And the choice is this: Are we going to continue with an economy where the overwhelming share of the benefits go to big corporations and the very wealthy? Or are we going to take this moment right now to set this country on a new path — one that invests in this nation; creates real, sustained economic growth; and that benefits everyone, including working people and middle-class folks?

      That’s something we haven’t realized in this country for decades.

      Here’s the simple truth. For a long time, this economy has worked great for those at the very top, while ordinary, hardworking Americans — the people who built this country — have been basically cut out of the deal.

      And I’ve said this from the time I announced I was going to run: I believe this is a moment of potentially great change. This is our moment to deal working people back into the economy. This is our moment to prove to the American people that their government works for them, not just for the big corporations and those at the very top.

      Yet an off-the-cuff remark about asking wealthy people to accept slightly higher taxes is somehow all his breathless detractors want to pretend has ever existed.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        Man, it’s crazy how similar that sounds to exactly what Biden has been saying all along:

        I get your frustration, but this is a good thing. Bernie having the same message only strengthens it, and can convince people that won’t listen to Biden.

        We don’t have the luxury of picking allies. If holding my tongue gets us a reluctant ally, I’ll take it. None of us have to like each other. We just need to remember that fascism is the ultimate evil. We may bicker like dwarves and elves, but when the orcs appear, we need to fall lockstep shoulder to shoulder immediately.

      • crusa187
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        9 months ago

        Actions speak louder than words. Biden locked in Trump’s $2T tax cuts for the rich and corporations, bringing the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. Never mind the open loopholes they exploit to pay virtually nothing anyway. Then, Biden claims he wants to bump up the corporate tax rate to 28%, but can’t, for “reasons.”

        What is this halfway corpo-fascist stance? How are we going to pay for that?! By cutting social programs meant to support the working class. Biden is full of shit on this issue, open your eyes.

        • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          58
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Biden locked in Trump’s $2T tax cuts for the rich and corporations, bringing the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%.

          Nuance glossed over for the sake of partisan shit-flinging:

          He proposed over $3.5 trillion in new taxes, including raising the corporate rate to 28% from 21% and returning the top individual rate to 39.6% from 37% and taxing capital gains at those rates for Americans earning over $1 million. He promised no increases for those earning under $400,000 a year. But opposition from Republicans and Democratic senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema, now an Independent, forced Biden to scale back his revenue plans.

          Then, Biden claims he wants to bump up the corporate tax rate to 28%, but can’t, for “reasons.”

          Yes, reasons. Amazing how Bernie would have had to deal with exactly those same “reasons”, isn’t it?

          Biden is full of shit on this issue, open your eyes.

          Oh they’re quite open. Trust me on that.

          • underisk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            26
            ·
            9 months ago

            If only any of these convenient roadblocks and excuses could have stopped him from repeatedly funding and supporting genocide.

          • crusa187
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            24
            ·
            9 months ago

            Let me be clear - Bernie isn’t in office right now. If he were, he’d have likely come up with some way to deal with these two.

            It’s really too bad that Mr Biden couldn’t arrange an audience with President Manchin during this time to figure something out, since Manchin is calling all the shots. At least they got some things accomplished together. Any and all applicable environmental regs be damned.

            • Blackbeard@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Let me be clear - Bernie isn’t in office right now. If he were, he’d have likely come up with some way to deal with these two.

              LMFAO. I don’t even know where to start responding to that fanciful poppycock.

              It’s really too bad that Mr Biden couldn’t arrange an audience with President Manchin during this time to figure something out, since Manchin is calling all the shots.

              A government of multiple representatives from different places who must come to a decision as a group, THE HORROR!!!

              At least they got some things accomplished together. Any and all applicable environmental regs be damned.

              Politician negotiates. More at 11.

              • crusa187
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                9 months ago

                fanciful poppycock

                lol yeah you’re right, Bernie is too nice to have done anything here either, who am I kidding. Successfully navigating these kind of hurdles is not some impossible feat however, despite what the Biden admin and MSNBC might have you think. Consider how FDR dealt with the Dixiecrats. Could Biden have done more along those lines?

                multiple representatives

                Since when are voters represented in Washington? If you’re not a donor, you’ve been left out to dry since the 1970s, full stop. The middle class has been eradicated in this country, if it ever even existed to begin with, and Biden has been a central complicit figure in making that happen.

                negotiates

                Negotiates for what? More drilling, more oil and gas subsidies. And a massive handout for Manchin, who if you believe the pathetic Dem excuses, was the primary reason we couldn’t get anything done after electing Dems into a majority. Again, I call bullshit. Biden doesn’t want to do anything to help the people, and it shows in his actions. idgaf what he reads from his speech writers, I care about what he does.

                • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  We got four star basement politician over here.
                  If everything is so easy, why don’t you run for office?

            • clgoh@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              he’d have likely come up with some way to deal with these two

              And everyone would get a pony.

            • SupahRevs@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Bernie isn’t in office right now.

              Bernie is in office. He is the Chair of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. And he would not be in this position if the Democratic party had not heard what he is saying and agreed to demand government to perform better for the working class.

              https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/in-new-role-as-labor-committee-chair-bernie-sanders-says-corporations-should-be-nervous

  • TheKingBee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    If trump wins and America can’t defeat his senile version of fascism, then it’s already on the death bed waiting for the next republican to take power…

    trump is the best authoritarian we’re going to get, he’s easy mode, the republicans will get someone worse, someone who has the ability to think beyond his next shit.

    It’s not going to get better only worse…

  • chetradley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    I was proud to vote for Bernie in the 2016 and 2020 primaries, but I bit the bullet and phone banked for Biden even though he was far from my first choice. There’s way too much at stake here.

  • jobby@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Citizens United needs to be removed.

    The massive polarisation in the media needs to be addressed and the outright blatant lies told by the Rightwing goons needs to be legally stopped. ‘Free Speech’ my ass. They need to be labelled ‘opinion’ or ‘entertainment’ or something other than pretending to be ‘fair’ or ‘news’.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Ελληνικά
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think an “equal air time” law that requires that corrections to misinformation and disinformation be provided at the same scope, scale and duration as the offending material. Since Fox news backed down on their dominion case, they ought to reprint every article, rehost every show and re-run every ribbon and banner on all of their platforms for next 3 years, admitting that they lied, linking sources to proof of their lies, and advising everyone that 2020 had no meaningful amounts of voter fraud on either side. Failure to do so should be fined at a rate of 1000 dollars per second of missed remediation time.

      • Saracha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Unfortunately the law would’ve never applied to fox news, as it was broadcast only and cable was exempt. But even so nowadays so much of the information sphere is online, through Facebook, Twitter and the thousand different right wing blog news sites that you aren’t really going to be able to stop anything. The American system very dependent on the two parties having a bipartisan consensus. But after a few decades of the right wing media sphere whipping the base into frenzy after frenzy the ‘true believers’ are the ones in government now and the idea of compromise is done for.

        • Quadhammer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          That all breaks down though when you can point to foreign actors stirring the pot. Republicans are really letting other countries decide their fate at this point

    • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      The massive polarisation in the media needs to be addressed and the outright blatant lies told by the Rightwing goons needs to be legally stopped. ‘Free Speech’ my ass. They need to be labelled ‘opinion’ or ‘entertainment’ or something other than pretending to be ‘fair’ or ‘news’.

      Replace “rightwing goons” with “leftwing commies” and this is exactly Trump’s plan lmao. Do you not see how that is a problem?

      • SupahRevs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        What left wing media empire has spread lies so much as to be sued for hundreds of millions of dollars? This is not a two sides issue.

        • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m not pushing it as a two sides issue. I haven’t seen anyone in the Democratic establishment advocating for media censorship like this. I’m talking about you, as an individual. You’re not a side.

          • jobby@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            I’m not advocating ‘censorship’. I’m advocating for standards of truth in news media. Unless it’s laid out as the facts, it’s opinion.

            This used to be the case until Murdoch and the GOP changed the law to allow bullshit.

            • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              If you’re talking about the fairness doctrine, it required broadcast networks to devote equal time to both sides of controversial issues. It never applied to opinion shows, which are like 2/3rds of the content on 24 hour cable news networks, and it never applied to cable. You could bring it back tomorrow and it wouldn’t change anything about Fox News.

              There is not, nor has there ever been, a legal ‘standard of truth’ for news media. There shouldn’t be. If you trust the government to decide what is true and punish the media for reporting otherwise, what’s to stop trump or the next trump from weaponizing that? That is why the first amendment exists.

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    9 months ago

    We don’t have much of a democracy as things stand considering the average person doesn’t influence policy lol. If all hope is on Biden clutching it out then we better brace for the end. Dems had 4 years to plan ahead.

    • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      We did plan ahead, I’m sorry you don’t like what we planned but you were also fully welcome to participate in the process the entire time.

      • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        The same process that locked Bernie out?

        The same one where biden literally promised he would be a one term president but now has turned around and is running again and there is no democratic challenger?

        • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes that process. Sorry your internet comments didn’t work to stop us!

      • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        If becoming less popular than when you beat Trump and enabling genocide is planning ahead, then I guess it is over.

        • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Sorry to hear you’re giving up but I guess that makes it easier for me.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    9 months ago

    Funny how many comments just went poof! Gone! So this place is basically /r/politics now? Mods smoking out every opinion they don’t like?

    Funny thing is, the deleted comments were from liberals, not raging conservatives spewing bile and lies. Must not have passed the purity test.

      • Kedly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        9 months ago

        Lmao, I gave it a quick glance and saw the most recent person I blocked for being an angry asshole get unblocked and then reblocked from an instance within a minute

      • fidodo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Is there a way to filter by post? It’s hard to find anything when it’s everything from all communities.

    • lingh0e@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Or maybe the mods are actually moderating by cutting out the off-topic arguments and BS threads that don’t contribute anything to the overall discourse of the discussion.

      • Jode@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I can imagine most of the comments were 14yo’s and trolls saying GeNoCiDe JoE hUrRrR

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      So what do you think that means for mod bias if they’re deleting “liberal” comments on a platform that is largely home to leftists?

    • ZK686@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      9 months ago

      My thoughts exactly. Why is it that these “politics” sites just end up going completely Left? Is this “politics” or “Democrat Politics?” I get confused… apparently, the Right isn’t allowed to have an opinion any where anymore…

      • Soulg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You’re allowed to have an opinion and we’re allowed to tell you that your opinion sucks

      • Tinidril@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        Does the right still have anything left to say that isn’t hate speech? The entire conservative economic schtick has failed the reality test so badly that most conservatives don’t even want to talk about it anymore. It’s all border wall nonsense, election denial, and reactionary isolationism now, and that’s the saner half of conservatism.

        • ZK686@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Yes. I’m Mexican American, family came here from Mexico, legally in the 50’s. Worked hard, and established a great life. We were raised in a strict Catholic household, so, ideally, my family always votes Republican. This doesn’t make us horrible people. We simply believe in different things than Liberals/Democrats. However, I’m also a firm believer in Gay Rights, Abortion, and social programs. But, I think there needs to be limits, rules, and restrictions on a lot of that stuff. That’s where most of my political beliefs start to lean more Right. Sounds like you’re just profiling based on what you read on Reddit and Lemmy. That’s like me saying all Democrats and Liberals are anti-gun, anti-religion, and hate white people We know that’s not true.

          • Tinidril@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            We were raised in a strict Catholic household, so, ideally, my family always votes Republican.

            Political parties are not like sports teams and you aren’t required to vote for a particular party just because you were born into it. Anyways, there is no correlation between being Catholic and voting for Republicans. Also, Biden is Catholic, and Trump is not - just in case you think that’s relevant.

            This doesn’t make us horrible people.

            I never said anything about you being horrible. My comments were directed at the current state of Republican policy and rhetoric, not the personal character of Republican voters.

            I’m also a firm believer in Gay Rights, Abortion, and social programs.

            Your Pope is also a firm believer in social programs. He doesn’t support Gay Rights and Abortion, but he takes a very different stance on them than Republicans.

            But, I think there needs to be limits, rules, and restrictions on a lot of that stuff.

            So do Democrats. I’ve noticed this tendency for people on the right to make these kinds of sweeping statements that sound like fundamental policy positions but are really so meaningless that anybody could say they support them. “I believe in small government.” “I am against excessive regulation.” etc. No real point there, I just find it interesting.

            The biggest curtailment of the welfare state in the least 100 years came from the Clinton administration. Obama’s biggest safety net accomplishment was Obamacare, which was originally a plan from the extremely right wing Heritage Foundation.

            You’re just profiling based on what you read on Reddit and Lemmy.

            No, I’m really not. Again, my comments were on the current state of Republican policy and rhetoric, so “profiling” doesn’t come into it. This goes back to my point about sports teams. My observations are also based on what I see coming out of Republican politicians and media figures. Conservatives on Lemmy, and especially Reddit tend to keep largely to their own insulated communities, and I don’t often visit.

        • ZK686@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think there should be limits and restrictions on social programs. I believe in tough on crime, funding more police, not less. I believe that we should be allowed to question the billions being sent to Ukraine, without being told we’re traitors and spineless. The Republicans are the ones trying to limit the amount of money we send all over the world, and for some reason, this makes them the party of the “bad guys.” I’m against many ultra liberal views, like allowing petty theft to go unpunished, allowing the homeless crisis to grow in California because apparently, it’s “not their fault.”

  • CaptainProton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    By supporting a different Republican, how hard is it? In many states you can even vote in the primary of a party you’re not part of, people think it’s beneath them to pick a candidate of the party they dislike whose agenda is least-unlikable. There’s no law preventing you from switching parties on a whim.

  • Alsephina
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    9 months ago

    I like the insinuation that the US is an actual “democracy” lmao

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      If we do an election and the wrong candidate wins, the democracy goes away.

      So you can’t vote for the wrong candidate.

      And also, you can’t vote for a third-party candidate.

      And also, you can’t abstain from voting.

      So, really, you have exactly one choice that you’re allowed to make.

      Democracy!

      • iquanyin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        but “allowed” is not accurate. you’re allowed to do any of those things. it’s just that all of them blow, and one blows less.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          There’s downticket stuff and that shouldn’t be ignored.

          At the same time, we get meager media coverage of the downticket races so its very difficult to discern who is good and who sucks unless you’ve got an in-group to turn to. I like to pretend I’m active in Dem circles, but I’ll be damned if I know who to vote for on my state senate seat much less all the judiciary races. The one guy I liked to primary out the loathsome Liz Fletcher turned out to be a serial sexual harasser.

          But yeah, pretending my vote in Texas will swing the national election is absurd. And then trying to tie that national election vote back to “Oh no, democracy is ending if you don’t vote for my guy!” is even fucking dumber.

          • andros_rex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Oklahoma has very limited down ticket options. I get to choose whether I want to vote for people who call people like me “filth” or well meaning people that’ll burn out and move away after they lose.

        • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          We could actually improve our democracy by making voting mandatory.

          We’d get a better representation of how all of the voting-age population feels.

          Then maybe we can get politicians that support more thorough voting system reform.

  • quitenormal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    9 months ago

    I know you mrrrkns absolutely hate it when furriners’ talk about your politics, but it saddens me to see a fellow democracy in such a state. Both these guys are demented old f&@ks! These are the best candidates your democratic system can give you? Really? I know we Aussies have plenty to cringe about, but jeez!