I might have misunderstood this but is Android really trying to push this as tracking as a privacy upgrade, simply because it let’s us choose which of our interests we want advertisers to have access to?

  • Pantherina@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    No some OS preinstall microG. Because only if the core is finished you can hash and sign it, if the user flashes some apps afterwards that doesnt work.

    Btw ROM is read only memory, a tiny part of the firmware

    • Fisch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      MicroG is open source tho and only talks to Google if you explicitely activate it

      • Pantherina@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        No its not. They download Google Binaries which run as system apps and have privileged access.

        They practice badness enumeration in some form, while their permission model (only activating what is needed) is a better approach but incomplete.

        Any app that relies on Play has those libraries implemented, so they could show ads etc. on their own. But with microG they have a component with privileged system access, in contrast to sandboxed play where no component is privileged.

        • Fisch
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s completely false, where did you get that info from?

          • Pantherina@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            GrapheneOS discuss. Their Github repo looks like they actually have the sources for everything.