• Flori@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    238
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    10 months ago

    Your friendly reminder that the Brave CEO is Mozillas old CEO, who was fired from Mozilla for being unapologetically homophobic.

    • Rose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Worse than merely being homophobic, as he financially supported politicians and causes that worked to prevent equal rights.

      • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Then you can not act on it and those of us who care about such things can. Does that bother you?

        • AnonTwo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          37
          ·
          10 months ago

          I mean it’s derailed the entire thread so pretty much nobody is talking about the removed feature anymore.

          • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            36
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Are you seriously complaining about different comment threads within a post? That is literally how this works. Anybody who wants to talk about the feature is welcome to. You are not restricted to one thread at a time.

            Be real, you just don’t like the critique of brave.

            • AnonTwo@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              25
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I mean, it’s more like I wanted to see more discussion about brave. It’s not even like it’s talking about things the CEO specifically did to the browser, it’s just talking about the CEO.

              And yeah I’m complaining about different threads in a post, when 3 comments are about the browser and like 15 are about the CEO.

              If you have something to say negative about brave from this feature, that’s cool, but I’m not seeing it.

              • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                19
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                You are spending more time than anybody discussing this. The person wrote one short comment and here you are going back and forth still. If you want to talk about the removed feature then talk about the removed feature! Nobody stopping you my dude

                • beardown@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  14
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  If you’re a real person then you’re very unlikable and antisocial

                  If you’re a shill against Brave then you’re bad at your job. I’m going to check Brave out now because of your offensive and unlikable behavior

              • Umbrias@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                10 months ago

                “People want to talk about the things they care about when they should be talking about the things I care about!”

      • YeetPics@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        technical issues

        Well technically the CEO would have an issue with you if you were gay

        Lmao

        • dime@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          10 months ago

          Please don’t tell me you wear adidas (founded by a Nazi), or drive a Ford (made by an antisemite), or listen to Wagner, (a racist), or drive a Volkswagen, or play Minecraft, or use wix, or eat at Chick-fil-A, or…etc etc

          • Flori@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I don’t. But “originally made by” and “currently being run by” are, in my opinion, two different things

        • AnonTwo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          25
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Wait why are you on the privacy community when you don’t care about the parts that are specifically related to privacy?

            • AnonTwo@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Uhhh…that’s not a meme, as the other guy said it’s virtue signalling. I don’t even know why you would fallback on it being a meme since people generally agreed with what you said.

              If anything I think that makes you sound like an ass but that’s just me.

          • RandoCalrandian@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            32
            ·
            10 months ago

            For those oh so super valuable virtue signal points, as if most of the services and products they use weren’t created with slave labor and run by people who’ve done far worse

    • Engywuck@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      116
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      He wasn’t fired. He voluntarily left. And thus Mozilla is left with an incompetent CEO whose only aim is to increase her paycheck year after year, despite pathetic market share results for FF. Enjoy that.

      That said, nobody cares about your “friendly remainders”. We’re talking about software here, not politics.

      And, to stay on topic, yes, it happened to me that Strict FP broke some website, in particular those displaying a frame with a map or similar stuff. So I’ve resorted to use “standard” FP myself.

      • AtmaJnana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        97
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        10 months ago

        nobody cares about your “friendly remainders”. We’re talking about software here, not politics.

        Nah. I care. You dont speak for me. I cant tell if you’re a shill for Brave or a MAGAt or both.

        • RandoCalrandian@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          56
          ·
          10 months ago

          Wow. The internet must be really rough for you if people don’t wear labels so you know who to hate before learning a damn thing about them!

          • LWD@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Yeah, it’s terrible when an entire group of people are discriminated against for a label.

        • Engywuck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          62
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m not a shill for Brave. It has its fair share of technical issues but it’s the less worse browser for my use case (better than FF, anyway). Your (or mine) opinion on the CEO has nothing to do with the technical issue discussed in OP’s link.

          And no, what MAGA are you talking about? I’m not even 'murican. Take your meds, dude.

            • MinekPo1 [She/Her]@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              As someone who is currently inside of mental hospital grounds , reminding people to take their meds isnt bad I’d say . /hj

              On a serious side I feel like this isn’t that bad , as it is more general than using a specific issue as an insult

        • AnonTwo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          58
          ·
          10 months ago

          I mean, you can grandstand all you want while you have no platforms to safely do it on. Pretty sure having working products for privacy is more important to activism than one guy being an asshole.

            • ChemicalPilgrim@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              49
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yeah that’s rarely the only trait someone has that I find objectionable. Homophobia tends to come in a cluster with other shithead opinions

            • AnonTwo@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              29
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              I’m…honestly surprised you can be on lemmy when you damn products over singular people. Just cause I know there’s people who have tried to dissuade others from lemmy over the developers. And in that case the people involved are even closer to the code than a CEO would be.

              • Lmaydev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                21
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                10 months ago

                If someone gets fired for being a piece of shit and then hired somewhere else it’s pretty fair to assume that company isn’t great. As they presumably knew that when they hired him and didn’t care.

                It’s also the person running the company not some random employee.

                • AnonTwo@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Okay

                  But in this entire discussion we haven’t even tied him or his homophobia to the feature change this article is discussing.

              • LWD@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                10 months ago

                Lemmy is one of the least “owned by a single person” projects online.

            • RandoCalrandian@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              35
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              🤔 look, I’m not defending bigotry….

              But an aggressive homophobe seems like the type to be highly motivated to care deeply about working privacy tools these days

              So who exactly do you trust?

      • Umbrias@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        Technology and ethics and politics are not airgapped magically distinct things. Pretending that they are is a strategic political choice you are actively making.

        • Engywuck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Ok. I’m a bad person because I enjoy using a given browser. I get that.

          Another one that goes on my ignore list. Bye.

          • Umbrias@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            If that’s what you feel is the case if you don’t separate politics from technology then that sounds like a personal problem to address.

          • MrFunnyMoustache
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Ok. I’m a bad person because I enjoy using a given browser. I get that.

            This is a straw man argument; no one said you’re a bad person for using a certain browser.

            nobody cares about your “friendly remainders”. We’re talking about software here, not politics.

            This is what they are criticising you about. You could be using Edge or Chrome, it wouldn’t matter here, that wouldn’t make you a bad person. The point is that pretending there is no connection when there is clearly a huge relevance here is massive.

            • Engywuck@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              The point is that pretending there is no connection when there is clearly a huge relevance here is massive.

              In the imagination of upvotes-hungry virtue-signaling people, of course.

      • LWD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Do you hate the Brave CEO for doing the same thing as the Mozilla CEO, but with even less restraint?

        Or are you just whining in hopes that nobody will question whether you’re being a hypocrite

        • Engywuck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yawn… I’m tired of this shit. You people are really ridiculous. I’m going to just block you. Enjoy your cognitive dissonance and your virtue signaling.

        • Engywuck@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          10 months ago

          What is beyond my understanding is why every fucking time someone posts some relevant TECHNICAL info or question about that browser there’s always someone else, which appears to be less smart than an amoeba, that feels the need to write the same exaggerate and OT bullshit about the CEO.