• WalnutLum
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Are all these wacky licenses because the OSI doesn’t have an AGPL (ostensibly anti-cloud) equivalent BSD style permissive license?

    • thesmokingman@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The ostensible point is to prevent resellers from platforming your code. SSPL is an answer to, say, AWS offering your product much cheaper than you can. RSAL seems to be Redis spinning their own SSPL, BSL, whatever bullshit license because they’re not happy with the existing faux open source cloud licenses that prevent platforming.

      There really isn’t a good way to handle this from an open source perspective. Cloud majors can and will undercut the fuck out of anyone to establish dominance. Ideally you’re providing a better support experience or working with them (until they decide to kneecap you) to maintain your business. Previously Redis had an paid tier that had functionality not available at the OSS level. I think that’s also legit.

      I personally loathe the compliance issues these random shitty fucking licenses throw and don’t think trying to claw back business from majors is the right approach. The little guy is going to follow the path of least resistance which means you’ve made your software enterprise only.