There are different income brackets in here, so going out to purchase items isn’t the most feasible.

  • @BlinkyOP
    link
    1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • @TheConquestOfBed
      link
      32 years ago

      I mean, that’s kind of the point? You’re trying to take an anthropological concept about unselfish resource sharing in small tribal villages where everyone grew up together, and apply it to disparate people habituated to a capitalist economy where many of the norms that uphold a gift economy are very dead. In order to make it work you have to recreate the conditions that give rise to gift economies.

      Now, if you want to use barter you can increase the reach of the system to people you don’t know directly. And it would be much less dependent on mutual trust.

      • @BlinkyOP
        link
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        deleted by creator

        • @TheConquestOfBed
          link
          12 years ago

          Barter only requires trust at the point of contact that the trade will be fair, so it’s technically available to anyone, but has geographic limitations since physical items are used.

          • @BlinkyOP
            link
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            deleted by creator

            • @TheConquestOfBed
              link
              12 years ago

              It’s not really better or worse than using currency, it just exists.