Just because of that?
I’m not into dog dicks either but as long as the community is properly marked as NSFW and stays within its bounds, I don’t see why it should be removed or have its creator banned.
Stanley is probably just trolling with this dog dick nonsense fwiw.
Can the TOS have a strict definition of what encompasses that? Would cut down on smart-assed posters arguing about what constitutes porn in the future.
Pornography is a nebulous term and can be interpreted in many ways. Just look at the neverending porn Vs erotic art debate for example.
If we make it more specific, theres a risk that people post questionable things, arguing that they are not technically against the rules. So I’m not sure thats a good idea. In the end its always a subjective decision of admins/mods which content gets removed or not.
Just because of that?
I’m not into dog dicks either but as long as the community is properly marked as NSFW and stays within its bounds, I don’t see why it should be removed or have its creator banned.
Porn is against the rules, simple as that.
Stanley is probably just trolling with this dog dick nonsense fwiw.
Can the TOS have a strict definition of what encompasses that? Would cut down on smart-assed posters arguing about what constitutes porn in the future.
Pornography is a nebulous term and can be interpreted in many ways. Just look at the neverending porn Vs erotic art debate for example.
If we make it more specific, theres a risk that people post questionable things, arguing that they are not technically against the rules. So I’m not sure thats a good idea. In the end its always a subjective decision of admins/mods which content gets removed or not.
I hope the subjectiveness allows for the time honoured tradition of Chapo users posting pigpoopballs.jpg?
I’m not a fan of that, but it certainly cant be considered as porn.