Stanley is probably just trolling with this dog dick nonsense fwiw.
Can the TOS have a strict definition of what encompasses that? Would cut down on smart-assed posters arguing about what constitutes porn in the future.
Pornography is a nebulous term and can be interpreted in many ways. Just look at the neverending porn Vs erotic art debate for example.
If we make it more specific, theres a risk that people post questionable things, arguing that they are not technically against the rules. So I’m not sure thats a good idea. In the end its always a subjective decision of admins/mods which content gets removed or not.
Porn is against the rules, simple as that.
Stanley is probably just trolling with this dog dick nonsense fwiw.
Can the TOS have a strict definition of what encompasses that? Would cut down on smart-assed posters arguing about what constitutes porn in the future.
Pornography is a nebulous term and can be interpreted in many ways. Just look at the neverending porn Vs erotic art debate for example.
If we make it more specific, theres a risk that people post questionable things, arguing that they are not technically against the rules. So I’m not sure thats a good idea. In the end its always a subjective decision of admins/mods which content gets removed or not.
I hope the subjectiveness allows for the time honoured tradition of Chapo users posting pigpoopballs.jpg?
I’m not a fan of that, but it certainly cant be considered as porn.