• poVoq
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    deleted by creator

    • ancomOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      I am not defending them

      that’s all you do here. not really anything more.

      nearly 100 year old examples and thus drawing false analogies.

      what’s false analogies? Contemporary tankies justify most genocides done under the USSR.

      • poVoq
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        deleted by creator

        • ancomOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 years ago

          because they can easily rationalize away some age old stuff.

          That’s what they always do. It is called gaslighting. Felix, dev of lemmy, justified Assad and how he cracked down something that started as a simple protest and eventually resulted in mass murder. They will reply with very long threads why [something about CIA] [something about shit libs] [something about the enemy of my enemy is my friend] [something about anti-ameria and justifying any other imperium that takes position against US] and because of that it was necessary.

          Nothing more then gaslighting that follows all the time the same patterns.

            • ancomOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 years ago

              what ever genocide it is,tankies will always justify it if it is done by a country that they claim to be an ally.

              It is an ideological concept that you can’t disproof with logic. It is an dogma, that justifies itself.

              • poVoq
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                deleted by creator

                • ancomOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  That’s not what I’m saying here. I’m saying that their mind set is dogmatic. That does not mean that it’s permanent, but if you aim to create a dialogue that gives a chance to question such dogmas, it is useful to understand they exist. If you create a dialogue where the dogma can just justify itself, it will deepen their ideological believes.

                  You want to question their dogmas? Understand how they function first.

                  • poVoq
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 years ago

                    deleted by creator