• @soferman
      link
      3
      edit-2
      3 years ago

      deleted by creator

      • @slippoint
        link
        4
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        Noone’s talking about lab creation, but rather the fact the research institution in question specializes in virology. So they would go into the field(/bat caves in this case) to collect virus samples to bring back to the lab in Wuhan to study (as that’s literally their job).

        Mistakes happen, and a researcher could have simply been infected by one of these collected samples before going onto infect other people.

        • @AgreeableLandscapeM
          link
          6
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          In that case, I don’t see how that’s the striking condemnation of China that Western media makes the lab theory out to be. The virus is still of entirely natural origin, and it was spread inadvertently. Maybe in that case you could make the argument that the lab and/or the workers responsible should bear responsibility and that it was negligence as opposed to a freak accident, but usually when Westerners talk about the lab theory they think “China was researching COVID specifically to destroy the world REEEEE”

          • @poVoq
            link
            6
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            deleted by creator

            • @Nevar
              link
              2
              edit-2
              3 years ago

              deleted by creator

            • @AgreeableLandscapeM
              link
              1
              edit-2
              3 years ago

              Somehow it had to make the jump to humans and human to human transmission

              Could the fact that it could naturally infect humans not be the reason they were studying it? I mean, we only have circumstantial evidence for a lab leak so it seems like jumping the gun to try and come up with theories on the details anyway.

              • @poVoq
                link
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                deleted by creator

          • @slippoint
            link
            -3
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            Well, I just read this article by Daily Mail, so we’ll have to see what the research says when it’s published.

          • @soferman
            link
            -4
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            deleted by creator

            • @Nevar
              link
              5
              edit-2
              3 years ago

              deleted by creator

              • @soferman
                link
                -3
                edit-2
                3 years ago

                deleted by creator

                • @Nevar
                  link
                  3
                  edit-2
                  3 years ago

                  deleted by creator

                  • @soferman
                    link
                    -7
                    edit-2
                    3 years ago

                    deleted by creator

            • @AgreeableLandscapeM
              link
              3
              edit-2
              3 years ago

              Because I’ve heard all the arguments the West has against them, and they’re all either without sufficient evidence or blatantly false.

              You’ve probably seen these debunk lists floating around this site, maybe even posted by me, in case you haven’t, bam and bam.

        • @soferman
          link
          0
          edit-2
          3 years ago

          deleted by creator