• @TheImpressiveX
    link
    English
    616 months ago

    We know it’s ad-free and zero cost, but will it be DRM-free as well?

      • @grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        406 months ago

        Not only is it not allowed to be DRM’d, “US government IP” is itself an oxymoron: stuff published by the government is Public Domain, so it doesn’t even count as “intellectual property [sic]” to begin with.

        • @maryjayjay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Edit: I realize from the replies that my point was off base and actually opposite of the debate here. I’m going to leave this in its place, but thanks to the responders that showed me this wasn’t the right place to make the point I was trying to.

          • @RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            36 months ago

            Govt research grants are not videos literally being published by the govt. They aren’t particularly comparable siuations. It’s why I can’t just buy a stock of Disney and suddenly have free access to their IP. Meanwhile I can rehost whole programs put out by NASA with zero issue.

            I get the anger and it’s justified, but man is it misdirected here.

        • @cjf@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          56 months ago

          This would only be true in the US. What about the rest of the world?

          • TheMurphy
            link
            fedilink
            English
            66 months ago

            In this case, free in the rest of the world as well.

            They could geo-lock it if they wanted, but that’s not the road NASA likes to take in general.

          • @PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            Good question. I think as long as you can already access the NASA app, NASA TV (it’s on YouTube, too), and NASA’s websites, then this should be no different. IIRC one press release said they wanted to share their content “with the world”, so it sounds like that’s a yes, but again I’m not 100% sure. Hopefully we find out in a few days :)

    • @gapbetweenus@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      446 months ago

      Most NASA stuff is published under non affiliation free use license - you can do what ever you like with it.

    • @Alteon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      196 months ago

      I wouldn’t be surprised if a majority of the content is already freely downloadable from somewhere…

      • @Sanyanov@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        546 months ago

        A budget that goes into space exploration, development of groundbreaking science that has its use both in space and on Earth, popularization of science among masses, democratizing access to cutting-edge knowledge, making it free for everyone, including kids and the poor, to access at any time? Yes, please.

            • @aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -106 months ago

              Probably true to some extent. Though, at what point do you decide it’s better to just directly give the money to people?

              • @flerp@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                36 months ago

                Considering it is such a small percentage of the budget and they have developed so much useful technology (https://www.howtogeek.com/831363/these-nasa-innovations-are-all-around-us-everyday/)

                I would say, take the money from other things that suck, like handouts to the rich and wasteful military overspending which would easily cover the things we need to cover. Defunding NASA would contribute to the dummification of the country and is a terrible idea.

                • @aidan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  06 months ago

                  Considering it is such a small percentage

                  Currently, but during many of the innovations it was a much higher percentage. And why do you assume there wouldn’t be other, maybe more impactful innovations, if NASA money and NASA researchers weren’t working on something else?

              • themeatbridge
                link
                fedilink
                English
                36 months ago

                There’s no situation where it isn’t better to just give the money directly to the people who need it.

          • @GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            10
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            That would be great, but that’s not NASA’s department. Try Congress first. Then the DOD. Edit: and then the morally bankrupt billionaires.

            • @aidan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              06 months ago

              I’m not advocating NASA donate the money, I’m advocating considering cutting NASA’s budget

        • @greywolf0x1
          link
          English
          -276 months ago

          Especially if you don’t live in the shitty country. Yes please, sacrifice the physical and mental wellbeing of Americans for an indepth knowledge of the Universe just before you regress into full facism. Your war crimes won’t be overlooked though.

          • DarkenLM
            link
            fedilink
            286 months ago

            I am not even American, but I do know that the US Army budget makes the NASA budget look like pocket change.

            I’d say you’re focusing on the wrong sector…

            • @jayandp@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              126 months ago

              Seriously, I’m always confused by people complaining about NASA’s budget. It’s peanuts in comparison to the other stuff our Government wastes money on. Also doesn’t help that the government itself is responsible for a lot of the money wasting that happens at NASA. The Artemis program being the perfect example, which is basically just a glorified jobs program at this point, as mandated by the government, instead of actually being a smart way of building a rocket.

              • @gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                86 months ago

                US americans are complaining for nasa, public schools if they don’t have kids, public health sector, even for bike lanes because they use no bikes, but almost never for all the military expenses on the other side of the earth.

                • @flerp@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  46 months ago

                  People who are so uneducated that they think funding public education is a bad investment are great proof of why we need better public education…

          • @GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            116 months ago

            NASA isn’t sacrificing American’s wellbeing, regressing into fascism, or committing war crimes. That’s multiple other branches of the government. Despite whatever media you’re consuming the US gov isn’t one unified dictatorship, as much as a certain political group would like it to be.

            NASA is one of the few branches of our government that’s actually somewhat decent and doesn’t need a complete overhaul to benefit our country or world. It’s already paying us back the relatively small budget allocated to them in several ways. So your comment is basically a whataboutism.

      • MrScottyTay
        link
        fedilink
        English
        126 months ago

        Maybe you’s could do a similar thing for healthcare and get healthcare for free, like this new nasa+ thing. Wouldn’t that be wild

        • @UNWILLING_PARTICIPANT@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 months ago

          But what about the profits of insurance companies that act as gatekeepers to your healthcare?? Are those people just supposed to get different jobs? Bet you didn’t think about who you would be hurting

          Sarcasm

      • @dellish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        66 months ago

        The funny thing with tax is you don’t get choose how it’s spent. Tax money is public money that ought to be spent in the public interest, and NASA is a perfectly good example of this. Other good examples are infrastructure, parks, public healthcare and free education. Bad examples of tax expenditure are the ridiculous military complex, massive corporate subsidies and contractors doing poor work that the government should be directly controlling.